» Articles » PMID: 38256540

Scheduling of Remote Monitoring for Peritoneal Dialysis Patients

Abstract

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is performed as a home-based treatment and in this context, telemedicine has been proven helpful for improving clinicians' surveillance and maintaining PD patients in their home setting. The new e-health devices make remote patient monitoring (RPM) for automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) treatment possible, evaluating the data at the end of every treatment and adapting the prescription at distance if necessary. This paper aims to share a method for improving clinical surveillance and enabling PD patients to receive their treatment at home. In the present case series, we delineate the clinical protocol of the Vicenza PD Center regarding patient characteristics, timing, and the purpose of the APD-RPM. We present the Vicenza PD Center's experience, illustrating its application through three case reports as exemplars. Telemedicine helps to carefully allocate healthcare resources while removing the barriers to accessing care. However, there is a risk of data overload, as some data might not be analyzed because of an increased workload for healthcare professionals. A proactive physician's attitude towards the e-health system has to be supported by clinical instructions and legislative rules. International and national guidelines may suggest which patients should be candidates for RPM, which parameters should be monitored, and with what timing. According to our experience, we suggest that the care team should define a workflow that helps in formulating a correct approach to RPM, adequately utilizing resources. The workflow has to consider the different needs of patients, in order to assure frequent remote control for incident or unstable patients, while prevalent and stable patients can perform their home treatment more independently, helped by periodic and deferred clinical supervision.

Citing Articles

Management of Peritoneal Dialysis-Associated Emergencies during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Experience of a Center of Excellence.

Iorga C, Iorga C, Andreiana I, Stancu S, Bengulescu I, Constantin T Life (Basel). 2024; 14(7).

PMID: 39063560 PMC: 11277704. DOI: 10.3390/life14070805.

References
1.
Milan Manani S, Rosner M, Virzi G, Giuliani A, Berti S, Crepaldi C . Longitudinal Experience with Remote Monitoring for Automated Peritoneal Dialysis Patients. Nephron. 2019; 142(1):1-9. DOI: 10.1159/000496182. View

2.
Sun L, Qu M, Chen B, Li C, Fan H, Zhao Y . Effectiveness of mHealth on Adherence to Antiretroviral Therapy in Patients Living With HIV: Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023; 11:e42799. PMC: 9903184. DOI: 10.2196/42799. View

3.
Stauss M, Floyd L, Becker S, Ponnusamy A, Woywodt A . Opportunities in the cloud or pie in the sky? Current status and future perspectives of telemedicine in nephrology. Clin Kidney J. 2021; 14(2):492-506. PMC: 7454484. DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfaa103. View

4.
Cruz J, Brooks D, Marques A . Home telemonitoring effectiveness in COPD: a systematic review. Int J Clin Pract. 2014; 68(3):369-78. DOI: 10.1111/ijcp.12345. View

5.
Milan Manani S, Crepaldi C, Giuliani A, Virzi G, Garzotto F, Riello C . Remote Monitoring of Automated Peritoneal Dialysis Improves Personalization of Dialytic Prescription and Patient's Independence. Blood Purif. 2018; 46(2):111-117. DOI: 10.1159/000487703. View