» Articles » PMID: 38255071

Perceptions, Attitudes, and Barriers Towards the Use of Central Board for Accreditation of Healthcare Institutions (CBAHI) Standards Among Saudi Healthcare Providers

Abstract

Background: Quality improvement is a strategic priority for all healthcare systems. However, the engagement of healthcare providers in pursuing accreditation plays a critical role in integrating standards into routine practice. Therefore, the current study assessed the perceptions, attitudes, and barriers towards using the Central Board for Accreditation of Healthcare Institutions (CBAHI) standards among Saudi healthcare providers.

Method: This cross-sectional study was conducted in 2023 among a representative sample (364) of Saudi healthcare providers (both genders, aged 20-60) working at twenty governmental CBAHI-accredited hospitals in Saudi Arabia. The study participants were selected using a cluster random sampling method. Data regarding the perceptions, attitudes, and barriers toward using CBAHI standards among Saudi healthcare providers were evaluated using a validated questionnaire. Additional information regarding demographic-socioeconomic variables was obtained with an interview-based questionnaire. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 28.

Results: A total of 364 healthcare providers participated in the current study. Of them, 54.4% were males, and 45.6% were females. Almost half (48.6%) of the study participants held bachelor's degrees. For the variables of age group, marital status, monthly income, and years of work experience, statistically significant associations were found between males and females (-value < 0.05). The means of overall item agreement percentage of the participating healthcare providers for perceptions and attitudes towards using CBAHI standards and attitudes towards using CBAHI standards as a tool for quality improvement were 80.1%, 76.4%, and 72.0%, respectively. The highest item agreement percentage of the participating healthcare providers regarding the barriers that inhibit the hospital from obtaining the full benefit from the CBAHI accreditation was for the inexpedient IT tools (59.6%).

Conclusion: The current study's results demonstrated accepted perceptions and attitudes toward using CBAHI standards among Saudi healthcare providers. In addition, the identified barriers should be alleviated to improve the quality, effectiveness, and efficiency of the hospitals in Saudi Arabia. The findings also help clarify the accreditation operating process, which may be helpful to policymakers and stakeholders in making informed decisions on integrating accreditation standards.

Citing Articles

Integration of Electronic Invoices in Healthcare Finance: A Case Study of Ministry of Health Hospitals in Saudi Arabia.

Alshameri A, Alnahdi E, Bahamdain F, Almutairi L, Alshaikhi O, Alamri O Cureus. 2024; 16(10):e71712.

PMID: 39553015 PMC: 11568834. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.71712.


Accreditation Made Easy: Step-by-Step Guide for Healthcare Institutions.

Newera A, Alomari F, Al-Ghamdi A, Fouda M Glob J Qual Saf Healthc. 2024; 7(4):232-235.

PMID: 39534238 PMC: 11554392. DOI: 10.36401/JQSH-24-X5.


Impact of JACIE accreditation on safety of patient care: healthcare providers perspective from a tertiary care stem cell transplant center in Saudi Arabia.

Bayoumy M, Almasari A, Orabe A, Shihata N, AlBeirouti B, AlJohani N Bone Marrow Transplant. 2024; 59(12):1786-1788.

PMID: 39341928 DOI: 10.1038/s41409-024-02387-z.


Evolution of the accreditation program for healthcare organizations in KSA: From present to future.

M Alshathri D, F Alsuhaimi A, A Alwahabi S, M Elmaghrabi M, Hussein M J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2023; 19(1):130-132.

PMID: 37964863 PMC: 10641268. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2023.10.002.

References
1.
Habib R, Blanche G, Souha F, El-Jardali F, Nuwayhid I . Occupational health and safety in hospitals accreditation system: the case of Lebanon. Int J Occup Environ Health. 2016; 22(3):201-208. PMC: 5102229. DOI: 10.1080/10773525.2016.1200211. View

2.
Almasabi M, Thomas S . The impact of Saudi hospital accreditation on quality of care: a mixed methods study. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2016; 32(4):e261-e278. DOI: 10.1002/hpm.2373. View

3.
Hassanain M . An Overview of the Performance Improvement Initiatives by the Ministry of Health in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Inquiry. 2017; 54:46958017707872. PMC: 5798699. DOI: 10.1177/0046958017707872. View

4.
Al-Alawy K, Moonesar I, Ali Mubarak Obaid H, Gaafar R, Ismail Al-Abed Bawadi E . A Mixed-Methods Study to Explore the Impact of Hospital Accreditation. Inquiry. 2021; 58:46958020981463. PMC: 7970682. DOI: 10.1177/0046958020981463. View

5.
Joseph L, Agarwal V, Raju U, Mavaji A, Rajkumar P . Perception of Hospital Accreditation Impact among Quality Management Professionals in India: A Survey-Based Multicenter Study. Glob J Qual Saf Healthc. 2023; 4(2):58-64. PMC: 10228987. DOI: 10.36401/JQSH-20-44. View