» Articles » PMID: 38255041

The Effectiveness and Safety of Chuna Manual Therapy Adjuvant to Western Medicine in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized, Single-Blind, Investigator-Initiated, Pilot Trial

Overview
Specialty Health Services
Date 2024 Jan 23
PMID 38255041
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Recently, non-pharmacological treatments are gaining increasing importance for improving the quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This pilot study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of conducting extensive research on Chuna manual therapy (CMT). This study investigated the effectiveness and safety of CMT adjuvant to Western medicine (WM) in patients with COPD. Forty patients with COPD were randomized into two groups in a 1:1 ratio: experimental (CMT plus WM) and control (WM only) groups. The CMT intervention was administered once a week for eight weeks. The primary outcome measured was the 6-min walk distance (6MWD). Secondary outcomes measured were: forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), assessments using the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) scale and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for dyspnea, the COPD Assessment Test (CAT), St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and the EuroQoL five-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D). The mean differences in FEV1 (L) between Weeks 1 and 8 were statistically significant between the groups ( = 0.039). Additionally, the experimental group showed improved 6MWD, mMRC, VAS for dyspnea, CAT, SGRQ (total), and EQ-VAS scores than the control group. However, the differences between the two groups were not statistically significant. No adverse events were observed during this trial. CMT has the potential to alleviate symptoms, improve quality of life, and delay the decline in lung function in patients with COPD. The results of this pilot study could lead to large-scale clinical trials in the future.

Citing Articles

Comparative efficacy of traditional non-pharmacological add-on treatments in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Roh J, Leem J, Lee B, Kim K, Jung H Front Public Health. 2025; 13:1410342.

PMID: 40061465 PMC: 11885152. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1410342.

References
1.
Miravitlles M, Auladell-Rispau A, Monteagudo M, Vazquez-Niebla J, Mohammed J, Nunez A . Systematic review on long-term adverse effects of inhaled corticosteroids in the treatment of COPD. Eur Respir Rev. 2021; 30(160). PMC: 9488732. DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0075-2021. View

2.
Roh J, Kim K, Jung H . The efficacy of manual therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review. PLoS One. 2021; 16(5):e0251291. PMC: 8130973. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251291. View

3.
Kon S, Canavan J, Jones S, M Nolan C, Clark A, Dickson M . Minimum clinically important difference for the COPD Assessment Test: a prospective analysis. Lancet Respir Med. 2014; 2(3):195-203. DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(14)70001-3. View

4.
Heneghan N, Adab P, Balanos G, Jordan R . Manual therapy for chronic obstructive airways disease: a systematic review of current evidence. Man Ther. 2012; 17(6):507-18. DOI: 10.1016/j.math.2012.05.004. View

5.
Nici L, Mammen M, Charbek E, Alexander P, Au D, Boyd C . Pharmacologic Management of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. An Official American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020; 201(9):e56-e69. PMC: 7193862. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202003-0625ST. View