» Articles » PMID: 38254904

Segmentation of 71 Anatomical Structures Necessary for the Evaluation of Guideline-Conforming Clinical Target Volumes in Head and Neck Cancers

Overview
Journal Cancers (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Oncology
Date 2024 Jan 23
PMID 38254904
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The delineation of the clinical target volumes (CTVs) for radiation therapy is time-consuming, requires intensive training and shows high inter-observer variability. Supervised deep-learning methods depend heavily on consistent training data; thus, State-of-the-Art research focuses on making CTV labels more homogeneous and strictly bounding them to current standards. International consensus expert guidelines standardize CTV delineation by conditioning the extension of the clinical target volume on the surrounding anatomical structures. Training strategies that directly follow the construction rules given in the expert guidelines or the possibility of quantifying the conformance of manually drawn contours to the guidelines are still missing. Seventy-one anatomical structures that are relevant to CTV delineation in head- and neck-cancer patients, according to the expert guidelines, were segmented on 104 computed tomography scans, to assess the possibility of automating their segmentation by State-of-the-Art deep learning methods. All 71 anatomical structures were subdivided into three subsets of non-overlapping structures, and a 3D nnU-Net model with five-fold cross-validation was trained for each subset, to automatically segment the structures on planning computed tomography scans. We report the DICE, Hausdorff distance and surface DICE for 71 + 5 anatomical structures, for most of which no previous segmentation accuracies have been reported. For those structures for which prediction values have been reported, our segmentation accuracy matched or exceeded the reported values. The predictions from our models were always better than those predicted by the TotalSegmentator. The sDICE with 2 mm margin was larger than 80% for almost all the structures. Individual structures with decreased segmentation accuracy are analyzed and discussed with respect to their impact on the CTV delineation following the expert guidelines. No deviation is expected to affect the rule-based automation of the CTV delineation.

References
1.
Nikolov S, Blackwell S, Zverovitch A, Mendes R, Livne M, De Fauw J . Clinically Applicable Segmentation of Head and Neck Anatomy for Radiotherapy: Deep Learning Algorithm Development and Validation Study. J Med Internet Res. 2021; 23(7):e26151. PMC: 8314151. DOI: 10.2196/26151. View

2.
Gregoire V, Ang K, Budach W, Grau C, Hamoir M, Langendijk J . Delineation of the neck node levels for head and neck tumors: a 2013 update. DAHANCA, EORTC, HKNPCSG, NCIC CTG, NCRI, RTOG, TROG consensus guidelines. Radiother Oncol. 2013; 110(1):172-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.10.010. View

3.
Wasserthal J, Breit H, Meyer M, Pradella M, Hinck D, Sauter A . TotalSegmentator: Robust Segmentation of 104 Anatomic Structures in CT Images. Radiol Artif Intell. 2023; 5(5):e230024. PMC: 10546353. DOI: 10.1148/ryai.230024. View

4.
Ibragimov B, Xing L . Segmentation of organs-at-risks in head and neck CT images using convolutional neural networks. Med Phys. 2017; 44(2):547-557. PMC: 5383420. DOI: 10.1002/mp.12045. View

5.
Balagopal A, Nguyen D, Morgan H, Weng Y, Dohopolski M, Lin M . A deep learning-based framework for segmenting invisible clinical target volumes with estimated uncertainties for post-operative prostate cancer radiotherapy. Med Image Anal. 2021; 72:102101. DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2021.102101. View