» Articles » PMID: 38254405

Identification of Signatures of Positive Selection That Have Shaped the Genomic Landscape of South African Pig Populations

Overview
Journal Animals (Basel)
Date 2024 Jan 23
PMID 38254405
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

South Africa boasts a diverse range of pig populations, encompassing intensively raised commercial breeds, as well as indigenous and village pigs reared under low-input production systems. The aim of this study was to investigate how natural and artificial selection have shaped the genomic landscape of South African pig populations sampled from different genetic backgrounds and production systems. For this purpose, the integrated haplotype score (iHS), as well as cross population extended haplotype homozygosity (XP-EHH) and Lewontin and Krakauer's extension of the statistic based on haplotype information (HapFLK) were utilised. Our results revealed several population-specific signatures of selection associated with the different production systems. The importance of natural selection in village populations was highlighted, as the majority of genomic regions under selection were identified in these populations. Regions under natural and artificial selection causing the distinct genetic footprints of these populations also allow for the identification of genes and pathways that may influence production and adaptation. In the context of intensively raised commercial pig breeds (Large White, Kolbroek, and Windsnyer), the identified regions included quantitative loci (QTLs) associated with economically important traits. For example, meat and carcass QTLs were prevalent in all the populations, showing the potential of village and indigenous populations' ability to be managed and improved for such traits. Results of this study therefore increase our understanding of the intricate interplay between selection pressures, genomic adaptations, and desirable traits within South African pig populations.

Citing Articles

African Local Pig Genetic Resources in the Context of Climate Change Adaptation.

Pius L, Huang S, Wanjala G, Bagi Z, Kusza S Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(16).

PMID: 39199941 PMC: 11350805. DOI: 10.3390/ani14162407.

References
1.
Mohlatlole R, Madoroba E, Muchadeyi F, Chimonyo M, Kanengoni A, Dzomba E . Virulence profiles of enterotoxigenic, shiga toxin and enteroaggregative Escherichia coli in South African pigs. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2013; 45(6):1399-405. DOI: 10.1007/s11250-013-0377-4. View

2.
Penrith M, Vosloo W, Mather C . Classical swine fever (hog cholera): review of aspects relevant to control. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2011; 58(3):187-96. DOI: 10.1111/j.1865-1682.2011.01205.x. View

3.
Amar S, De Boni L, de Voux A, Heath L, Geertsma P . An outbreak of African swine fever in small-scale pigs, Gauteng, South Africa, July 2020. Int J Infect Dis. 2021; 110 Suppl 1:S44-S49. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.04.003. View

4.
Storey J, Tibshirani R . Statistical significance for genomewide studies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003; 100(16):9440-5. PMC: 170937. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1530509100. View

5.
Abraham G . The importance of muscarinic receptors in domestic animal diseases and therapy: Current and future perspectives. Vet J. 2015; 208:13-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.10.025. View