Adaptive Aspects of Maximizing in Times of COVID-19: Coping Efforts Linking Maximization to Well-being

Overview

Journal Front Psychol

Date 2024 Jan 22

PMID 38250098

Authors

Young Joo Jun

Incheol Choi

Joo Hyun Kim

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: Maximization, the tendency to make the best choices by thoroughly searching and comparing alternatives, has long been considered a negative correlate of well-being. However, recently, it was proposed that having a maximizing tendency can lead to better coping efforts in some stressful situations and thus could be more adaptive. The objective of the present research was to demonstrate positive features of maximization and identify the coping strategies that mediate the relationship between maximization and well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: A sample of 3,493 participants responded to an online survey from January 20 to October 11 of 2020. The 13-item Maximization Scale assessed individuals' maximizing tendency in terms of the maximization index and its three subdimensions (i.e., high standards, alternative search, and decision difficulty). The use of four coping strategies (i.e., preventive measures, cognitive appraisal, self-distraction, and social connection) during the COVID-19 pandemic was assessed. Hedonic and eudaimonic aspects of well-being were measured. We developed a mediation model and examined both whether there was an indirect link between maximization and well-being through the coping strategies and whether there was a direct link between maximization and well-being.

Results: Path analysis revealed negative direct associations between maximization measures (i.e., an index and three subdimensions) and well-being. In addition, significant indirect paths were found with varying directions depending on maximization dimensions and coping strategy types. There were positive indirect associations between the maximization index and well-being via preventive measures, between high standards and well-being through preventive measures and cognitive appraisal, and between alternative search and well-being through self-distraction and social connection. Negative indirect associations were found between decision difficulty and well-being through cognitive appraisal, self-distraction, and social connection.

Discussion: The current study confirmed the existence of inconsistent mediation effects between maximization and well-being via coping and highlighted coping efforts as one of the positive aspects of maximization. Discussion addressed the double-edged effect of maximization on well-being and its beneficial nature in times of distress. Future studies should examine other potential situations and moderators that can delineate maximization's various characteristics with a longitudinal design and samples from diverse backgrounds.

References

Cauberghe V, Van Wesenbeeck I, De Jans S, Hudders L, Ponnet K . How Adolescents Use Social Media to Cope with Feelings of Loneliness and Anxiety During COVID-19 Lockdown. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2020; 24(4):250-257. DOI: 10.1089/cyber.2020.0478. View

Suk H, Choi E, Na J, Choi J, Choi I . Within-person day-of-week effects on affective and evaluative/cognitive well-being among Koreans. Emotion. 2020; 21(5):1114-1118. DOI: 10.1037/emo0000930. View

Carver C, Scheier M, Weintraub J . Assessing coping strategies: a theoretically based approach. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1989; 56(2):267-83. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.56.2.267. View

Li M, Jia H, Wang H . Maximizing tendency predicts university adjustment and academic performance. Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1188410. PMC: 10282641. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1188410. View

Yang M, Chiou W . Looking online for the best romantic partner reduces decision quality: the moderating role of choice-making strategies. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2010; 13(2):207-10. DOI: 10.1089/cyber.2009.0208. View

Kim H, Sherman D, Taylor S . Culture and social support. Am Psychol. 2008; 63(6):518-26. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X. View

Misuraca R, Teuscher U, Carmeci F . Who are maximizers? Future oriented and highly numerate individuals. Int J Psychol. 2015; 51(4):307-11. DOI: 10.1002/ijop.12169. View

Iyengar S, Wells R, Schwartz B . Doing better but feeling worse. Looking for the "best" job undermines satisfaction. Psychol Sci. 2006; 17(2):143-50. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01677.x. View

Misuraca R, Teuscher U . Time flies when you maximize - maximizers and satisficers perceive time differently when making decisions. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2013; 143(2):176-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.03.004. View

10.

Moore R, Lee A, Hancock J, Halley M, Linos E . Age-Related Differences in Experiences With Social Distancing at the Onset of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Computational and Content Analytic Investigation of Natural Language From a Social Media Survey. JMIR Hum Factors. 2021; 8(2):e26043. PMC: 8191726. DOI: 10.2196/26043. View

11.

Henrich J, Heine S, Norenzayan A . The weirdest people in the world?. Behav Brain Sci. 2010; 33(2-3):61-83. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X0999152X. View

12.

Choi I, Kim J, Kim N, Choi E, Choi J, Suk H . How COVID-19 affected mental well-being: An 11- week trajectories of daily well-being of Koreans amidst COVID-19 by age, gender and region. PLoS One. 2021; 16(4):e0250252. PMC: 8064534. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250252. View

13.

Polizzi C, Jay Lynn S, Perry A . Stress and Coping in the Time of Covid-19: Pathways to Resilience and Recovery. Clin Neuropsychiatry. 2021; 17(2):59-62. PMC: 8629051. DOI: 10.36131/CN20200204. View

14.

Kokkoris M . Maximizing Without Borders: Evidence That Maximizing Transcends Decision Domains. Front Psychol. 2019; 9:2664. PMC: 6340960. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02664. View

15.

Carver C . You want to measure coping but your protocol's too long: consider the brief COPE. Int J Behav Med. 1997; 4(1):92-100. DOI: 10.1207/s15327558ijbm0401_6. View

16.

Newman D, Schug J, Yuki M, Yamada J, Nezlek J . The negative consequences of maximizing in friendship selection. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2017; 114(5):804-824. DOI: 10.1037/pspp0000141. View

17.

Ahorsu D, Lin C, Imani V, Saffari M, Griffiths M, Pakpour A . The Fear of COVID-19 Scale: Development and Initial Validation. Int J Ment Health Addict. 2020; 20(3):1537-1545. PMC: 7100496. DOI: 10.1007/s11469-020-00270-8. View

18.

Ma M, Zhao N, Zhang L . The Positive Side of Maximization: Linking Maximization Tendency With Meaning in Life Through Time Perspectives. Front Psychol. 2021; 12:708117. PMC: 8521064. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.708117. View

19.

Ang S, Malhotra R . Association of received social support with depressive symptoms among older males and females in Singapore: Is personal mastery an inconsistent mediator?. Soc Sci Med. 2016; 153:165-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.02.019. View

20.

MacKinnon D, Krull J, Lockwood C . Equivalence of the mediation, confounding and suppression effect. Prev Sci. 2001; 1(4):173-81. PMC: 2819361. DOI: 10.1023/a:1026595011371. View