» Articles » PMID: 38247564

Objective and Subjective Assessment of Music Perception and Musical Experiences in Young Cochlear Implant Users

Overview
Journal Audiol Res
Publisher MDPI
Date 2024 Jan 22
PMID 38247564
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

For many individuals, music has a significant impact on the quality and enjoyability of life. Cochlear implant (CI) users must cope with the constraints that the CI imposes on music perception. Here, we assessed the musical experiences of young CI users and age-matched controls with normal hearing (NH). CI users and NH peers were divided into subgroups according to age: children and adolescents. Participants were tested on their ability to recognize vocal and instrumental music and instruments. A music questionnaire for pediatric populations (MuQPP) was also used. CI users and NH peers identified a similar percentage of vocal music. CI users were significantly worse at recognizing instruments ( < 0.05) and instrumental music ( < 0.05). CI users scored similarly to NH peers on the MuQPP, except for the musical frequency domain, where CI users in the children subgroup scored higher than their NH peers ( = 0.009). For CI users in the children subgroup, the identification of instrumental music was positively correlated with music importance ( = 0.029). Young CI users have significant deficits in some aspects of music perception (instrumental music and instrument identification) but have similar scores to NH peers in terms of interest in music, frequency of music exposure, and importance of music.

Citing Articles

Can anatomy-based fitting improve musical perception in adult cochlear implant users?.

Lassaletta L, Calvino M, Sanchez-Cuadrado I, Munoz E, Gavilan J Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2024; 91(2):101533.

PMID: 39566293 PMC: 11617376. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2024.101533.

References
1.
Torppa R, Kuuluvainen S, Lipsanen J . The development of cortical processing of speech differs between children with cochlear implants and normal hearing and changes with parental singing. Front Neurosci. 2022; 16:976767. PMC: 9731313. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.976767. View

2.
Deroche M, Lu H, Limb C, Lin Y, Chatterjee M . Deficits in the pitch sensitivity of cochlear-implanted children speaking English or Mandarin. Front Neurosci. 2014; 8:282. PMC: 4158799. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2014.00282. View

3.
Moura J, Martins J, Alves M, Oliveira G, Ramos D, Alves H . Children then, adults now: long-term outcomes-performance at 15, 20, and 25 years of cochlear implant use. Front Rehabil Sci. 2024; 4:1275808. PMC: 10760633. DOI: 10.3389/fresc.2023.1275808. View

4.
Hwa T, Wen C, Ruckenstein M . Assessment of music experience after cochlear implantation: A review of current tools and their utilization. World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021; 7(2):116-125. PMC: 8103528. DOI: 10.1016/j.wjorl.2021.02.003. View

5.
Pacheco L, Miguel J, Gil D . Musical stimulation proposal for hearing impaired children: case reports. Codas. 2020; 32(5):e20190139. DOI: 10.1590/2317-1782/20202019139. View