» Articles » PMID: 38243107

Real-World Use of Ruxolitinib Cream: Safety Analysis at 1 Year

Overview
Specialty Dermatology
Date 2024 Jan 19
PMID 38243107
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Ruxolitinib cream is the first topical Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor approved in the United States (US) for the treatment of mild to moderate atopic dermatitis and nonsegmental vitiligo. A postmarketing study with oral tofacitinib, approved for rheumatoid arthritis, triggered class warnings for JAK inhibitors, including risk of serious infections, mortality, malignancy, major adverse cardiovascular events, and thrombosis. Because ruxolitinib cream is indicated for inflammatory conditions, it is subject to the same warnings as oral JAK inhibitors in the US. Here, nearly 14,000 patient-years of postmarketing safety data from the first year following market approval of ruxolitinib cream were reviewed.

Methods: The Incyte global safety database (21 September 2021-20 September 2022) and US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (as of 30 September 2022) were queried for adverse event (AE) reports received for ruxolitinib cream.

Results: The search identified 294 postmarketing individual case safety reports containing 589 events, including four serious AEs and no fatal AEs. AEs (i.e., any unfavorable sign, symptom, or disease) representing >2% of all events included application site pain (n = 16), atopic dermatitis (n = 15), skin irritation (n = 15), scratch (n = 14), and condition aggravated (n = 13). The four serious AEs were skin cancer (n = 2), pericarditis, and thrombocytopenia (both n = 1), none of which had sufficient information to assess possible relatedness to ruxolitinib cream. Serious AEs associated with the class warnings for JAK inhibitors were not reported.

Conclusions: Postmarketing safety data from the year following approval suggest ruxolitinib cream is generally well tolerated, without significant systemic AEs, and with a low incidence of application site reactions.

Citing Articles

Atopic Dermatitis Treatments Before and After Initiation of Ruxolitinib Cream: 6-Month Follow-Up Analysis of a US Payer Claims Database.

Liu J, Desai K, Teng C, Sturm D, Stockbower G, Patadia H Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2025; 17:69-77.

PMID: 39931253 PMC: 11809233. DOI: 10.2147/CEOR.S506043.


Topical Medications for Chronic Itch in Older Patients: Navigating a Pressing Need.

Bartley B, Pierce C, Hivnor C, Valdes-Rodriguez R Drugs Aging. 2025; 42(3):213-233.

PMID: 39883297 DOI: 10.1007/s40266-024-01174-1.


Recent clinical and mechanistic insights into vitiligo offer new treatment options for cell-specific autoimmunity.

Ezzedine K, Tannous R, Pearson T, Harris J J Clin Invest. 2025; 135(2.

PMID: 39817457 PMC: 11735104. DOI: 10.1172/JCI185785.


Ruxolitinib Cream 1.5%: A Review in Non-Segmental Vitiligo.

Kang C Drugs. 2024; 84(5):579-586.

PMID: 38625661 PMC: 11189965. DOI: 10.1007/s40265-024-02027-2.

References
1.
Langan S, Irvine A, Weidinger S . Atopic dermatitis. Lancet. 2020; 396(10247):345-360. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31286-1. View

2.
Barbarot S, Auziere S, Gadkari A, Girolomoni G, Puig L, Simpson E . Epidemiology of atopic dermatitis in adults: Results from an international survey. Allergy. 2018; 73(6):1284-1293. DOI: 10.1111/all.13401. View

3.
Nutten S . Atopic dermatitis: global epidemiology and risk factors. Ann Nutr Metab. 2015; 66 Suppl 1:8-16. DOI: 10.1159/000370220. View

4.
Bergqvist C, Ezzedine K . Vitiligo: A Review. Dermatology. 2020; 236(6):571-592. DOI: 10.1159/000506103. View

5.
Bibeau K, Pandya A, Ezzedine K, Jones H, Gao J, Lindley A . Vitiligo prevalence and quality of life among adults in Europe, Japan and the USA. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2022; 36(10):1831-1844. PMC: 9544885. DOI: 10.1111/jdv.18257. View