» Articles » PMID: 38242568

Development of the Reporting Infographics and Visual Abstracts of Comparative Studies (RIVA-C) Checklist and Guide

Abstract

People often use infographics (also called visual or graphical abstracts) as a substitute for reading the full text of an article. This is a concern because most infographics do not present sufficient information to interpret the research appropriately and guide wise health decisions. The Reporting Infographics and Visual Abstracts of Comparative studies (RIVA-C) checklist and guide aims to improve the completeness with which research findings of comparative studies are communicated and avoid research findings being misinterpreted if readers do not refer to the full text. The primary audience for the RIVA-C checklist and guide is developers of infographics that summarise comparative studies of health and medical interventions. The need for the RIVA-C checklist and guide was identified by a survey of how people use infographics. Possible checklist items were informed by a systematic review of how infographics report research. We then conducted a two-round, modified Delphi survey of 92 infographic developers/designers, researchers, health professionals and other key stakeholders. The final checklist includes 10 items. Accompanying explanation and both text and graphical examples linked to the items were developed and pilot tested over a 6-month period. The RIVA-C checklist and guide was designed to facilitate the creation of clear, transparent and sufficiently detailed infographics which summarise comparative studies of health and medical interventions. Accurate infographics can ensure research findings are communicated appropriately and not misinterpreted. By capturing the perspectives of a wide range of end users (eg, authors, informatics editors, journal editors, consumers), we are hopeful of rapid endorsement and implementation of RIVA-C.

Citing Articles

Visualising Medical Research: Exploring the Influence of Infographics on Professional Dissemination.

Butdisuwan S, Annamma L, Subaveerapandiyan A, George B, Kataria S ScientificWorldJournal. 2024; 2024:5422121.

PMID: 38919961 PMC: 11199065. DOI: 10.1155/2024/5422121.

References
1.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D . Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009; 151(4):264-9, W64. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135. View

2.
McInnes M, Moher D, Thombs B, McGrath T, Bossuyt P, Clifford T . Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies: The PRISMA-DTA Statement. JAMA. 2018; 319(4):388-396. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2017.19163. View

3.
Ibrahim A . Seeing is Believing: Using Visual Abstracts to Disseminate Scientific Research. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017; 113(4):459-461. DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2017.268. View

4.
Pferschy-Wenzig E, Pferschy U, Wang D, Mocan A, Atanasov A . Does a Graphical Abstract Bring More Visibility to Your Paper?. Molecules. 2016; 21(9). PMC: 5283664. DOI: 10.3390/molecules21091247. View

5.
Muller R, Ferreira G, Bejarano G, Gamble A, Kirk J, Sindone J . Do infographics 'spin' the findings of health and medical research?. BMJ Evid Based Med. 2024; . DOI: 10.1136/bmjebm-2024-113033. View