Editorial: Minimally Invasive Surgery in Gynecology Oncology: Current Trends and Controversies
Overview
Overview
Authors
Authors
Affiliations
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
References
1.
Di Donato V, Bogani G, Casarin J, Ghezzi F, Malzoni M, Falcone F
. Ten-year outcomes following laparoscopic and open abdominal radical hysterectomy for "low-risk" early-stage cervical cancer: A propensity-score based analysis. Gynecol Oncol. 2023; 174:49-54.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.04.030.
View
2.
Chaccour C, Giannini A, Golia DAuge T, Ayed A, Allahqoli L, Alkatout I
. Hysterectomy Using Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery Compared with Classic Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A New Advantageous Approach? A Systematic Review on Surgical Outcomes. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2023; 88(4):187-196.
DOI: 10.1159/000530797.
View
3.
Lecointre L, Pellerin M, Venkatasamy A, Fabacher T, Eberst L, Gantzer J
. Complete Laparoscopic Interval Debulking Surgery for Advanced Ovarian Cancer Achieves Similar Survival Outcomes to Open Approach: A Propensity-Matched Study. J Invest Surg. 2022; 35(6):1394-1401.
DOI: 10.1080/08941939.2022.2045396.
View
4.
Buzzaccarini G, Torok P, Vitagliano A, Petousis S, Noventa M, Hortu I
. Predictors of Pain Development after Laparoscopic Adnexectomy: A Still Open Challenge. J Invest Surg. 2022; 35(6):1392-1393.
DOI: 10.1080/08941939.2022.2056274.
View
5.
Pecorino B, DAgate M, Scibilia G, Scollo P, Giannini A, Di Donna M
. Evaluation of Surgical Outcomes of Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy and Total Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis of Data Collected before the LACC Trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(20).
PMC: 9603513.
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192013176.
View