» Articles » PMID: 38238433

Predicting Radiotherapy Patient Outcomes with Real-Time Clinical Data Using Mathematical Modelling

Overview
Journal Bull Math Biol
Publisher Springer
Specialties Biology
Public Health
Date 2024 Jan 18
PMID 38238433
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Longitudinal tumour volume data from head-and-neck cancer patients show that tumours of comparable pre-treatment size and stage may respond very differently to the same radiotherapy fractionation protocol. Mathematical models are often proposed to predict treatment outcome in this context, and have the potential to guide clinical decision-making and inform personalised fractionation protocols. Hindering effective use of models in this context is the sparsity of clinical measurements juxtaposed with the model complexity required to produce the full range of possible patient responses. In this work, we present a compartment model of tumour volume and tumour composition, which, despite relative simplicity, is capable of producing a wide range of patient responses. We then develop novel statistical methodology and leverage a cohort of existing clinical data to produce a predictive model of both tumour volume progression and the associated level of uncertainty that evolves throughout a patient's course of treatment. To capture inter-patient variability, all model parameters are patient specific, with a bootstrap particle filter-like Bayesian approach developed to model a set of training data as prior knowledge. We validate our approach against a subset of unseen data, and demonstrate both the predictive ability of our trained model and its limitations.

Citing Articles

Agent-Based Modeling of Virtual Tumors Reveals the Critical Influence of Microenvironmental Complexity on Immunotherapy Efficacy.

Wang Y, Bergman D, Trujillo E, Fernald A, Li L, Pearson A Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(17).

PMID: 39272799 PMC: 11394213. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16172942.


Multi-modality imaging parameters that predict rapid tumor regression in head and neck radiotherapy.

Aliotta E, Paudyal R, Diplas B, Han J, Hu Y, Oh J Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2024; 31:100603.

PMID: 39040433 PMC: 11261256. DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100603.

References
1.
Araujo R, McElwain D . A history of the study of solid tumour growth: the contribution of mathematical modelling. Bull Math Biol. 2004; 66(5):1039-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.bulm.2003.11.002. View

2.
Brady R, Enderling H . Mathematical Models of Cancer: When to Predict Novel Therapies, and When Not to. Bull Math Biol. 2019; 81(10):3722-3731. PMC: 6764933. DOI: 10.1007/s11538-019-00640-x. View

3.
Bruno R, Bottino D, De Alwis D, Fojo A, Guedj J, Liu C . Progress and Opportunities to Advance Clinical Cancer Therapeutics Using Tumor Dynamic Models. Clin Cancer Res. 2019; 26(8):1787-1795. PMC: 8415106. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-0287. View

4.
Claret L, Girard P, Hoff P, Van Cutsem E, Zuideveld K, Jorga K . Model-based prediction of phase III overall survival in colorectal cancer on the basis of phase II tumor dynamics. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27(25):4103-8. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.21.0807. View

5.
Welch B . The generalisation of student's problems when several different population variances are involved. Biometrika. 2010; 34(1-2):28-35. DOI: 10.1093/biomet/34.1-2.28. View