» Articles » PMID: 38236488

Out of Control: Computational Dynamic Control Dysfunction in Stress- and Anxiety-related Disorders

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2024 Jan 18
PMID 38236488
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Control theory, which has played a central role in technological progress over the last 150 years, has also yielded critical insights into biology and neuroscience. Recently, there has been a surging interest in integrating control theory with computational psychiatry. Here, we review the state of the field of using control theory approaches in computational psychiatry and show that recent research has mapped a neural control circuit consisting of frontal cortex, parietal cortex, and the cerebellum. This basic feedback control circuit is modulated by estimates of reward and cost via the basal ganglia as well as by arousal states coordinated by the insula, dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, amygdala, and locus coeruleus. One major approach within the broader field of control theory, known as proportion-integral-derivative (PID) control, has shown promise as a model of human behavior which enables precise and reliable estimates of underlying control parameters at the individual level. These control parameters correlate with self-reported fear and with both structural and functional variation in affect-related brain regions. This suggests that dysfunctional engagement of stress and arousal systems may suboptimally modulate parameters of domain-general goal-directed control algorithms, impairing performance in complex tasks involving movement, cognition, and affect. Future directions include clarifying the causal role of control deficits in stress- and anxiety-related disorders and developing clinically useful tools based on insights from control theory.

Citing Articles

Increasing the Construct Validity of Computational Phenotypes of Mental Illness Through Active Inference and Brain Imaging.

Limongi R, Skelton A, Tzianas L, Silva A Brain Sci. 2025; 14(12.

PMID: 39766477 PMC: 11674655. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14121278.


Depression and metabolic connectivity: insights into the locus coeruleus, HF-rTMS, and anxiety.

Wu G, Baeken C Transl Psychiatry. 2024; 14(1):459.

PMID: 39488540 PMC: 11531544. DOI: 10.1038/s41398-024-03171-9.


Sensorimotor Feedback Control Dysfunction as a Marker of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.

Howlett J, Park H, Paulus M Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2024; .

PMID: 39053579 PMC: 11754525. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2024.07.010.

References
1.
Howlett J, Larkin F, Touthang J, Kuplicki R, Lim K, Paulus M . Rapid, reliable mobile assessment of affect-related motor processing. Behav Res Methods. 2022; 55(8):4260-4268. PMC: 10700410. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-022-02015-y. View

2.
Browning M, Behrens T, Jocham G, OReilly J, Bishop S . Anxious individuals have difficulty learning the causal statistics of aversive environments. Nat Neurosci. 2015; 18(4):590-6. PMC: 4644067. DOI: 10.1038/nn.3961. View

3.
Shadmehr R, Reppert T, Summerside E, Yoon T, Ahmed A . Movement Vigor as a Reflection of Subjective Economic Utility. Trends Neurosci. 2019; 42(5):323-336. PMC: 6486867. DOI: 10.1016/j.tins.2019.02.003. View

4.
Diedrichsen J, Shadmehr R, Ivry R . The coordination of movement: optimal feedback control and beyond. Trends Cogn Sci. 2009; 14(1):31-9. PMC: 4350769. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2009.11.004. View

5.
Wolpert D, Miall R . Forward Models for Physiological Motor Control. Neural Netw. 1996; 9(8):1265-1279. DOI: 10.1016/s0893-6080(96)00035-4. View