» Articles » PMID: 38236190

Perceptual Learning Based on the Lateral Masking Paradigm in Anisometropic Amblyopia With or Without a Patching History

Abstract

Purpose: Perceptual learning (PL) has shown promising performance in restoring visual function in adolescent amblyopes. We retrospectively compared the effect of a well-accepted PL paradigm on patients with anisometropic amblyopia with or without a patching therapy history (patching therapy [PT] group versus no patching therapy [NPT] group).

Methods: Eighteen PT and 13 NPT patients with anisometropic amblyopia underwent monocular PL for 3 months. During training, patients practiced a Gabor detection task following the lateral masking paradigm by applying a temporal two-alternative forced choice procedure with the amblyopic eye. Monocular contrast sensitivity functions (CSF), visual acuity, interocular differences in visual function metrics, and stereoacuity were compared before and after training.

Results: PL improved the visual acuity of the amblyopia eyes by 0.5 lines on average in the PT group and 1.5 lines in the NPT group. A significant reduction in the interocular difference in visual acuity was observed in the NPT group (P < 0.01) but not in the PT group (P = 0.05). Regarding CSF metrics, the area under the log CSF and cutoff in the amblyopic eyes of the NPT groups increased after training (P < 0.05). In addition, the interocular differences of the CSF metrics (P < 0.05) in the NPT group were significantly reduced. However, in the PT group, all the CSF metrics were unchanged after training. A total of 27 of 31 patients in both groups had no measurable stereopsis pretraining, and recovery after training was not significant.

Conclusions: PL based on a lateral masking training paradigm improved visual function in anisometropic amblyopia. Patients without a patching history achieved greater benefits.

Translational Relevance: PL based on a lateral masking training paradigm could be a new treatment for amblyopia.

References
1.
Polat U, Mizobe K, Pettet M, Kasamatsu T, Norcia A . Collinear stimuli regulate visual responses depending on cell's contrast threshold. Nature. 1998; 391(6667):580-4. DOI: 10.1038/35372. View

2.
Knox P, Simmers A, Gray L, Cleary M . An exploratory study: prolonged periods of binocular stimulation can provide an effective treatment for childhood amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011; 53(2):817-24. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.11-8219. View

3.
Polat U, Ma-Naim T, Belkin M, Sagi D . Improving vision in adult amblyopia by perceptual learning. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004; 101(17):6692-7. PMC: 404107. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0401200101. View

4.
Wallace D, Repka M, Lee K, Melia M, Christiansen S, Morse C . Amblyopia Preferred Practice Pattern®. Ophthalmology. 2017; 125(1):P105-P142. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.10.008. View

5.
He Y, Feng L, Zhou Y, Zhuang Y, Xu Z, Yao Y . Characteristics and predictive factors of visual function improvements after monocular perceptual learning in amblyopia. Heliyon. 2023; 9(6):e17281. PMC: 10320034. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17281. View