» Articles » PMID: 38235003

IntelliCage: the Development and Perspectives of a Mouse- and User-friendly Automated Behavioral Test System

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 2024 Jan 18
PMID 38235003
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

IntelliCage for mice is a rodent home-cage equipped with four corner structures harboring symmetrical double panels for operant conditioning at each of the two sides, either by reward (access to water) or by aversion (non-painful stimuli: air-puffs, LED lights). Corner visits, nose-pokes and actual licks at bottle-nipples are recorded individually using subcutaneously implanted transponders for RFID identification of up to 16 adult mice housed in the same home-cage. This allows for recording individual in-cage activity of mice and applying reward/punishment operant conditioning schemes in corners using workflows designed on a versatile graphic user interface. IntelliCage development had four roots: (i) dissatisfaction with standard approaches for analyzing mouse behavior, including standardization and reproducibility issues, (ii) response to handling and housing animal welfare issues, (iii) the increasing number of mouse models had produced a high work burden on classic manual behavioral phenotyping of single mice. and (iv), studies of transponder-chipped mice in outdoor settings revealed clear genetic behavioral differences in mouse models corresponding to those observed by classic testing in the laboratory. The latter observations were important for the development of home-cage testing in social groups, because they contradicted the traditional belief that animals must be tested under social isolation to prevent disturbance by other group members. The use of IntelliCages reduced indeed the amount of classic testing remarkably, while its flexibility was proved in a wide range of applications worldwide including transcontinental parallel testing. Essentially, two lines of testing emerged: sophisticated analysis of spontaneous behavior in the IntelliCage for screening of new genetic models, and hypothesis testing in many fields of behavioral neuroscience. Upcoming developments of the IntelliCage aim at improved stimulus presentation in the learning corners and videotracking of social interactions within the IntelliCage. Its main advantages are (i) that mice live in social context and are not stressfully handled for experiments, (ii) that studies are not restricted in time and can run in absence of humans, (iii) that it increases reproducibility of behavioral phenotyping worldwide, and (iv) that the industrial standardization of the cage permits retrospective data analysis with new statistical tools even after many years.

Citing Articles

Robotic animals as new tools in rodent neuroscience research: proposed applications of zooinspired robots for mouse behavioral testing.

dIsa R Front Behav Neurosci. 2025; 19:1545352.

PMID: 40066371 PMC: 11891199. DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2025.1545352.


The first rodent behavioral study (1822) and the diffusion of human-bred albino rats and mice in the 19th century.

dIsa R Front Psychol. 2025; 15:1532975.

PMID: 39963185 PMC: 11831927. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1532975.


Time Perception Test in IntelliCage System for Preclinical Study: Linking Depression and Serotonergic Modulation.

Sysoeva O, Akhmirov R, Zaichenko M, Lazarenko I, Rebik A, Broshevitskaja N Diagnostics (Basel). 2025; 15(2).

PMID: 39857035 PMC: 11764329. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics15020151.


Modifying reaction time tasks parameters in the automated IntelliCage identifies heightened impulsivity and impaired attention in the 3xTg-AD model of Alzheimer's disease.

Judd J, Winslow W, McDonough I, Mistry F, Velazquez R Front Aging Neurosci. 2025; 16:1466415.

PMID: 39744522 PMC: 11688410. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2024.1466415.


Novel automated method to assess group dynamics reveals deficits in behavioral contagion in rats with social deficits.

Smirnov K, Starkov I, Sysoeva O, Midzyanovskaya I Front Behav Neurosci. 2025; 18:1519486.

PMID: 39744143 PMC: 11688315. DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2024.1519486.


References
1.
Smith K . Lab mice go wild: making experiments more natural in order to decode the brain. Nature. 2023; 618(7965):448-450. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-023-01926-w. View

2.
Masuda A, Kobayashi Y, Kogo N, Saito T, Saido T, Itohara S . Cognitive deficits in single App knock-in mouse models. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2016; 135:73-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.nlm.2016.07.001. View

3.
Puscian A, Leski S, Kasprowicz G, Winiarski M, Borowska J, Nikolaev T . Eco-HAB as a fully automated and ecologically relevant assessment of social impairments in mouse models of autism. Elife. 2016; 5. PMC: 5092044. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.19532. View

4.
Benraiss A, Wang S, Herrlinger S, Li X, Chandler-Militello D, Mauceri J . Human glia can both induce and rescue aspects of disease phenotype in Huntington disease. Nat Commun. 2016; 7:11758. PMC: 4899632. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms11758. View

5.
Too L, Mitchell A, McGregor I, Hunt N . Antibody-induced neutrophil depletion prior to the onset of pneumococcal meningitis influences long-term neurological complications in mice. Brain Behav Immun. 2016; 56:68-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbi.2016.01.021. View