Long-Term Outcomes of Resynchronization-Defibrillation for Heart Failure
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: The Resynchronization-Defibrillation for Ambulatory Heart Failure Trial (RAFT) showed a greater benefit with respect to mortality at 5 years among patients who received cardiac-resynchronization therapy (CRT) than among those who received implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). However, the effect of CRT on long-term survival is not known.
Methods: We randomly assigned patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II or III heart failure, a left ventricular ejection fraction of 30% or less, and an intrinsic QRS duration of 120 msec or more (or a paced QRS duration of 200 msec or more) to receive either an ICD alone or a CRT defibrillator (CRT-D). We assessed long-term outcomes among patients at the eight highest-enrolling participating sites. The primary outcome was death from any cause; the secondary outcome was a composite of death from any cause, heart transplantation, or implantation of a ventricular assist device.
Results: The trial enrolled 1798 patients, of whom 1050 were included in the long-term survival trial; the median duration of follow-up for the 1050 patients was 7.7 years (interquartile range, 3.9 to 12.8), and the median duration of follow-up for those who survived was 13.9 years (interquartile range, 12.8 to 15.7). Death occurred in 405 of 530 patients (76.4%) assigned to the ICD group and in 370 of 520 patients (71.2%) assigned to the CRT-D group. The time until death appeared to be longer for those assigned to receive a CRT-D than for those assigned to receive an ICD (acceleration factor, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.69 to 0.92; P = 0.002). A secondary-outcome event occurred in 412 patients (77.7%) in the ICD group and in 392 (75.4%) in the CRT-D group.
Conclusions: Among patients with a reduced ejection fraction, a widened QRS complex, and NYHA class II or III heart failure, the survival benefit associated with receipt of a CRT-D as compared with ICD appeared to be sustained during a median of nearly 14 years of follow-up. (RAFT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00251251.).
Recent Advances in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Current Treatment and Future Direction.
Siddiqui A, Tasouli-Drakou V, Ringor M, DiCaro M, Yee B, Lei K J Clin Med. 2025; 14(3).
PMID: 39941560 PMC: 11818169. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14030889.
Aschacher T, Pichler G, Derndorfer M, Tauber S, Grabenwoger M HeartRhythm Case Rep. 2024; 10(10):729-733.
PMID: 39664843 PMC: 11628801. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrcr.2024.07.010.
Richter S, Lemke B Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2024; 35(4):256-262.
PMID: 39557652 DOI: 10.1007/s00399-024-01054-6.
Left bundle branch area pacing: A new era of cardiac resynchronization therapy?.
Caruzzo C, Rigamonti E, Scopigni F World J Cardiol. 2024; 16(9):542-545.
PMID: 39351338 PMC: 11439098. DOI: 10.4330/wjc.v16.i9.542.
Cardiac Xenotransplantation: A Narrative Review.
Thuan P, Dinh N Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 25(7):271.
PMID: 39139422 PMC: 11317332. DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2507271.