Gender Differences in Long Term Sickness Absence

Overview

Journal BMC Public Health

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Public Health

Date 2024 Jan 15

PMID 38225639

Authors

Sheila Timp

Nicky van Foreest

Corne Roelen

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: Sickness absence is a major public health problem, given its high cost and negative impact on employee well-being. Understanding sickness absence duration and recovery rates among different groups is useful to develop effective strategies for enhancing recovery and reducing costs related to sickness absence.

Methods: Our study analyzed data from a large occupational health service, including over 5 million sick-listed employees from 2010 to 2020, out of which almost 600,000 cases were diagnosed by an occupational health physician. We classified each case according to diagnosis and gender, and performed descriptive statistical analysis for each category. In addition, we used survival analysis to determine recovery rates for each group.

Results: Mean sickness duration and recovery rate both differ significantly among groups. Mental and musculoskeletal disorders had the longest absence duration. Recovery rates differed especially during the first months of sickness absence. For men the recovery rate was nearly constant during the first 1.5 year, for women the recovery rate was relatively low in the first three months, and then stayed nearly constant for 1.5 year.

Conclusion: Across almost all diagnostic classes, it was consistently observed that women had longer average sickness absence durations than to men. Considering mental disorders and diseases of the musculoskeletal system, women had relatively lower recovery rates during the initial months compared to men. As time progressed, the recovery rates of both genders converged and became more similar.

Citing Articles

COVID-19 Pandemic Impact on Sickness Absences Among Healthcare Workers: A Cohort Study in a Spanish Hospital (2018-2023).

Lopez-Millan B, Benavides F, Ramada J, Serra C, Serra L, Utzet M Med Lav. 2025; 116(1).

PMID: 39992196 PMC: 11883835. DOI: 10.23749/mdl.v116i1.16525.

Chronic noncommunicable diseases and absenteeism from work: National Survey of Health, 2019.

Fernandes B, Spezani M, Bosco L, Souza B, Viviani G, Cunha L Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2024; 27:e240061.

PMID: 39699459 PMC: 11654286. DOI: 10.1590/1980-549720240061.

Associations of depressive symptoms and psychosocial working conditions with sickness absences in a Finnish cohort of 11,495 employees.

Anttila A, Nuutinen M, van Gils M, Pekki A, Sauni R Prev Med Rep. 2024; 47:102899.

PMID: 39444590 PMC: 11497368. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102899.

Gender differences in mental health-related sickness absence in the education sector.

Timp S, van Foreest N, van Rhenen W BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):2663.

PMID: 39350147 PMC: 11440751. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-20155-y.

Int Hout L, van Hees S, Vossen E, Oomens S, van de Mheen D, Blonk R J Occup Rehabil. 2024; .

PMID: 38985239 DOI: 10.1007/s10926-024-10224-9.

References

Laaksonen M, Mastekaasa A, Martikainen P, Rahkonen O, Piha K, Lahelma E . Gender differences in sickness absence--the contribution of occupation and workplace. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2010; 36(5):394-403. DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.2909. View

Koopmans P, Roelen C, Groothoff J . Parametric hazard rate models for long-term sickness absence. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2008; 82(5):575-82. DOI: 10.1007/s00420-008-0369-2. View

Mastekaasa A . The gender gap in sickness absence: long-term trends in eight European countries. Eur J Public Health. 2014; 24(4):656-62. DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/cku075. View

Joling C, Groot W, Janssen P . Duration dependence in sickness absence: how can we optimize disability management intervention strategies?. J Occup Environ Med. 2006; 48(8):803-14. DOI: 10.1097/01.jom.0000222583.70927.3e. View

Wolvetang S, van Dongen J, Spekle E, Coenen P, Schaafsma F . Sick Leave Due to Stress, What are the Costs for Dutch Employers?. J Occup Rehabil. 2022; 32(4):764-772. PMC: 9109658. DOI: 10.1007/s10926-022-10042-x. View

Bekker M, Rutte C, van Rijswijk K . Sickness absence: A gender-focused review. Psychol Health Med. 2009; 14(4):405-18. DOI: 10.1080/13548500903012830. View

Spierdijk L, van Lomwel G, Peppelman W . The determinants of sick leave durations of Dutch self-employed. J Health Econ. 2009; 28(6):1185-96. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2009.07.003. View

Arcas M, Delclos G, Tora-Rocamora I, Martinez J, Benavides F . Gender differences in the duration of non-work-related sickness absence episodes due to musculoskeletal disorders. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016; 70(11):1065-1073. DOI: 10.1136/jech-2014-204331. View

Casini A, Godin I, Clays E, Kittel F . Gender difference in sickness absence from work: a multiple mediation analysis of psychosocial factors. Eur J Public Health. 2013; 23(4):635-42. DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/cks183. View

10.

Roelen C, Koopmans P, Anema J, van der Beek A . Recurrence of medically certified sickness absence according to diagnosis: a sickness absence register study. J Occup Rehabil. 2010; 20(1):113-21. PMC: 2832874. DOI: 10.1007/s10926-009-9226-8. View

11.

Labriola M, Holte K, Christensen K, Feveile H, Alexanderson K, Lund T . The attribution of work environment in explaining gender differences in long-term sickness absence: results from the prospective DREAM study. Occup Environ Med. 2011; 68(9):703-5. DOI: 10.1136/oem.2010.060632. View

12.

Ross C, Mirowsky J . Does employment affect health?. J Health Soc Behav. 1995; 36(3):230-43. View

13.

van Rhenen W, Schaufeli W, van Dijk F, Blonk R . Coping and sickness absence. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2007; 81(4):461-72. PMC: 2175021. DOI: 10.1007/s00420-007-0238-4. View

14.

Lidwall U . Gender composition in occupations and branches and medically certified sick leave: a prospective population study. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2021; 94(7):1659-1670. PMC: 8384792. DOI: 10.1007/s00420-021-01672-4. View

15.

Loset G, Dale-Olsen H, Hellevik T, Mastekaasa A, von Soest T, Ostbakken K . Gender equality in sickness absence tolerance: Attitudes and norms of sickness absence are not different for men and women. PLoS One. 2018; 13(8):e0200788. PMC: 6070205. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200788. View

16.

Cornelius L, van der Klink J, Groothoff J, Brouwer S . Prognostic factors of long term disability due to mental disorders: a systematic review. J Occup Rehabil. 2010; 21(2):259-74. PMC: 3098343. DOI: 10.1007/s10926-010-9261-5. View

17.

Ostby K, Mykletun A, Nilsen W . Explaining the gender gap in sickness absence. Occup Med (Lond). 2018; 68(5):320-326. DOI: 10.1093/occmed/kqy062. View

18.

Leijon M, Hensing G, Alexanderson K . Gender trends in sick-listing with musculoskeletal symptoms in a Swedish county during a period of rapid increase in sickness absence. Scand J Soc Med. 1998; 26(3):204-13. DOI: 10.1177/14034948980260031101. View

19.

Lidwall U, Bergendorff S, Voss M, Marklund S . Long-term sickness absence: changes in risk factors and the population at risk. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2009; 22(2):157-68. DOI: 10.2478/v10001-009-0018-3. View

20.

Nilsen W, Skipstein A, Ostby K, Mykletun A . Examination of the double burden hypothesis-a systematic review of work-family conflict and sickness absence. Eur J Public Health. 2017; 27(3):465-471. PMC: 5445721. DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckx054. View