» Articles » PMID: 38223377

Peripartum Factors Associated with Variation in Voluntary Postpartum Hay Intake in Dairy Cows

Overview
Journal JDS Commun
Date 2024 Jan 15
PMID 38223377
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The objective of this research was to assess variation in postpartum hay intake when offered alongside total mixed ration (TMR) as free choice, and identify factors related to the hay intake. Twenty multiparous cows were fed a closeup TMR (21.5% starch, 39.1% neutral detergent fiber [NDF] on a dry matter [DM] basis). After calving, cows were offered free choice timothy hay (61.6% NDF, 9.6% crude protein) in addition to a fresh cow TMR (26.8% starch, 33.0% NDF) for the first 5 d postpartum. Cows were fed individually with separate mangers for TMR and hay, each offered ad libitum. Prepartum DM intake (DMI) was recorded, and baseline blood samples were collected after calving, but before the first postpartum feeding. Free choice hay intake ranged from 0 to 4.7 kg/d (DM basis) or 0 to 55.2% (% of total DMI). Cows that consumed more hay (% of total DMI) from d 1 through 5 postpartum had lower DMI 2 d before calving (r = -0.63), and greater baseline concentrations of plasma β-hydroxybutyrate (r = 0.60) and serum haptoglobin (r = 0.68). Additionally, hay intake (% of total DMI) from d 1 through 5 postpartum tended to be positively related to baseline plasma fatty acid concentration (r = 0.41). These findings suggest that cows with lower intake before calving and cows with greater ketone production and inflammation at calving may consume more hay, when offered separate from TMR.

References
1.
Shurkin J . News feature: Animals that self-medicate. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014; 111(49):17339-41. PMC: 4267359. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1419966111. View

2.
Kononoff P, Heinrichs A, Buckmaster D . Modification of the Penn State forage and total mixed ration particle separator and the effects of moisture content on its measurements. J Dairy Sci. 2003; 86(5):1858-63. DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73773-4. View

3.
Kyriazakis I, Tolkamp B, Emmans G . Diet selection and animal state: an integrative framework. Proc Nutr Soc. 2000; 58(4):765-72. DOI: 10.1017/s0029665199001044. View

4.
Cooper S, Kyriazakis I, Nolan J . Diet selection in sheep: the role of the rumen environment in the selection of a diet from two feeds that differ in their energy density. Br J Nutr. 1995; 74(1):39-54. DOI: 10.1079/bjn19950105. View

5.
Esposito G, Irons P, Webb E, Chapwanya A . Interactions between negative energy balance, metabolic diseases, uterine health and immune response in transition dairy cows. Anim Reprod Sci. 2014; 144(3-4):60-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2013.11.007. View