» Articles » PMID: 38218928

Comparison of Positive Pressure Ventilation Devices During Compliance Changes in a Neonatal Ovine Model

Overview
Journal Pediatr Res
Specialties Biology
Pediatrics
Date 2024 Jan 13
PMID 38218928
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: To compare tidal volume (V) delivery with compliance at 0.5 and 1.5 mL/cmHO using four different ventilation (PPV) devices (i.e., self-inflating bag (SIB), T-Piece resuscitator, Next Step (a novel Neonatal Resuscitator), and Fabian ventilator (conventional neonatal ventilator) using a neonatal piglet model.

Design/methods: Randomized experimental animal study using 10 mixed-breed neonatal piglets (1-3 days; 1.8-2.4 kg). Piglets were anesthetized, intubated, instrumented, and randomized to receive positive pressure ventilation (PPV) for one minute with a SIB with or without a respiratory function monitor (RFM), T-Piece resuscitator with or without an RFM, Next Step, and Fabian Ventilator with both compliance levels. Compliance changes were achieved by placing a wrap around the piglets' chest and tightened it. Our primary outcome was targeted V delivery of 5 mL/kg at 0.5 and 1.5 mL/cmHO lung compliance.

Results: At 0.5 mL/cmHO compliance, the mean(SD) expired V with the Next Step was 5.1(0.2) mL/kg compared to the Fabian 4.8(0.5) mL/kg, SIB 8.9(3.6) mL/kg, SIB + RFM 4.5(1.8) mL/kg, T-Piece 7.4(4.3) mL/kg, and T-Piece+RFM 6.4(3.1) mL/kg. At 1.5 mL/cmHO compliance, the mean(SD) expired V with the Next Step was 5.2(0.6) mL/kg compared to the Fabian 4.4(0.7) mL/kg, SIB 12.1(5.3) mL/kg, SIB + RFM 9.4(3.9) mL/kg, T-Piece 8.6(1.5) mL/kg, and T-Piece+RFM 6.5 (1.6) mL/kg.

Conclusion: The Next Step provides consistent V during PPV, which is comparable to a mechanical ventilator.

Impact: Current guidelines recommend fixed peak inflation pressure in resuscitation, linked to lung and brain injury. The Next Step Neonatal Resuscitator, a cost-effective device, offers volume-targeted positive pressure ventilation with consistent tidal volumes. With two different compliances, the Next Step Neonatal Resuscitator delivered a consistent tidal volume which was similar to a mechanical ventilator. The Next Step Neonatal Resuscitator outperformed self-inflating bags and T-Pieces in delivering targeted tidal volumes. The Next Step Neonatal Resuscitator could be an alternative ventilation device for neonatal resuscitation.

References
1.
Aziz K, Chadwick M, Baker M, Andrews W . Ante- and intra-partum factors that predict increased need for neonatal resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2008; 79(3):444-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2008.08.004. View

2.
Schmolzer G, Te Pas A, Davis P, Morley C . Reducing lung injury during neonatal resuscitation of preterm infants. J Pediatr. 2008; 153(6):741-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2008.08.016. View

3.
Schmolzer G, Kamlin O, ODonnell C, Dawson J, Morley C, Davis P . Assessment of tidal volume and gas leak during mask ventilation of preterm infants in the delivery room. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2010; 95(6):F393-7. DOI: 10.1136/adc.2009.174003. View

4.
Dawson J, Schmolzer G, Kamlin C, Te Pas A, ODonnell C, Donath S . Oxygenation with T-piece versus self-inflating bag for ventilation of extremely preterm infants at birth: a randomized controlled trial. J Pediatr. 2011; 158(6):912-918.e1-2. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2010.12.003. View

5.
Poulton D, Schmolzer G, Morley C, Davis P . Assessment of chest rise during mask ventilation of preterm infants in the delivery room. Resuscitation. 2010; 82(2):175-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.10.012. View