» Articles » PMID: 38204296

Parallel Cognitive Maps for Multiple Knowledge Structures in the Hippocampal Formation

Overview
Journal Cereb Cortex
Specialty Neurology
Date 2024 Jan 11
PMID 38204296
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The hippocampal-entorhinal system uses cognitive maps to represent spatial knowledge and other types of relational information. However, objects can often be characterized by different types of relations simultaneously. How does the hippocampal formation handle the embedding of stimuli in multiple relational structures that differ vastly in their mode and timescale of acquisition? Does the hippocampal formation integrate different stimulus dimensions into one conjunctive map or is each dimension represented in a parallel map? Here, we reanalyzed human functional magnetic resonance imaging data from Garvert et al. (2017) that had previously revealed a map in the hippocampal formation coding for a newly learnt transition structure. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging adaptation analysis, we found that the degree of representational similarity in the bilateral hippocampus also decreased as a function of the semantic distance between presented objects. Importantly, while both map-like structures localized to the hippocampal formation, the semantic map was located in more posterior regions of the hippocampal formation than the transition structure and thus anatomically distinct. This finding supports the idea that the hippocampal-entorhinal system forms parallel cognitive maps that reflect the embedding of objects in diverse relational structures.

Citing Articles

The Geometry and Dynamics of Meaning.

Gardenfors P Top Cogn Sci. 2024; 17(1):34-56.

PMID: 39522178 PMC: 11792772. DOI: 10.1111/tops.12767.


Decomposing dynamical subprocesses for compositional generalization.

Luettgau L, Erdmann T, Veselic S, Stachenfeld K, Kurth-Nelson Z, Moran R Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(46):e2408134121.

PMID: 39514320 PMC: 11573675. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2408134121.

References
1.
Schwartz M, Kimberg D, Walker G, Brecher A, Faseyitan O, Dell G . Neuroanatomical dissociation for taxonomic and thematic knowledge in the human brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011; 108(20):8520-4. PMC: 3100928. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1014935108. View

2.
Garvert M, Dolan R, Behrens T . A map of abstract relational knowledge in the human hippocampal-entorhinal cortex. Elife. 2017; 6. PMC: 5407855. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.17086. View

3.
Tucciarelli R, Wurm M, Baccolo E, Lingnau A . The representational space of observed actions. Elife. 2019; 8. PMC: 6894926. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.47686. View

4.
Leshinskaya A, Thompson-Schill S . Transformation of Event Representations along Middle Temporal Gyrus. Cereb Cortex. 2020; 30(5):3148-3166. PMC: 7197199. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhz300. View

5.
Clarke A, Tyler L . Object-specific semantic coding in human perirhinal cortex. J Neurosci. 2014; 34(14):4766-75. PMC: 6802719. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2828-13.2014. View