» Articles » PMID: 38202356

Geomagnetic Anomaly in the Growth Response of Peat Moss to Temperature

Overview
Journal Plants (Basel)
Date 2024 Jan 11
PMID 38202356
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Temperature plays an essential role in a plant's life. The current investigation reveals that photoreceptors, whose activity is affected by the geomagnetic field, are a critical element of its perception. This knowledge suggests that plants' responses to temperature could shift in different geomagnetic conditions. To test this hypothesis, we studied the change in the growth response of the peat moss to temperature with a gradual increase in the geomagnetic K index. Growth data for this species were collected from Karelian mires by detailed monitoring over eight full growing seasons. The growth of 209,490 shoots was measured and 1439 growth rates were obtained for this period. The analysis showed a strong positive dependence of sphagnum growth on temperature (r = 0.58; n = 1439; P = 1.7 × 10), which is strongest in the K range from 0.87 to 1.61 (r = 0.65; n = 464; P = 4.5 × 10). This K interval is clearer after removing the seasonal contributions from the growth rate and temperature and is preserved when diurnal temperature is used. Our results are consistent with the hypothesis and show the unknown contribution of the geomagnetic field to the temperature responses of plants.

Citing Articles

Threshold Behavior Hidden in the Growth Response of Peat Moss to Temperature.

Mironov V Plants (Basel). 2024; 13(22).

PMID: 39599450 PMC: 11598096. DOI: 10.3390/plants13223241.


Spatiotemporal analysis of seasonal trends in land surface temperature within the distribution range of Moringa peregrina (Forssk.) in Southern and Southeastern Iran.

Piri Sahragard H, Karami P PLoS One. 2024; 19(7):e0306642.

PMID: 39052565 PMC: 11271878. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306642.

References
1.
Maffei M . Magnetic field effects on plant growth, development, and evolution. Front Plant Sci. 2014; 5:445. PMC: 4154392. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00445. View

2.
Hore P, Mouritsen H . The Radical-Pair Mechanism of Magnetoreception. Annu Rev Biophys. 2016; 45:299-344. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-biophys-032116-094545. View

3.
Ahmad M, Galland P, Ritz T, Wiltschko R, Wiltschko W . Magnetic intensity affects cryptochrome-dependent responses in Arabidopsis thaliana. Planta. 2006; 225(3):615-24. DOI: 10.1007/s00425-006-0383-0. View

4.
Vigani G, Islam M, Cavallaro V, Nocito F, Maffei M . Geomagnetic Field (GMF)-Dependent Modulation of Iron-Sulfur Interplay in . Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22(18). PMC: 8469209. DOI: 10.3390/ijms221810166. View

5.
Norby R, Childs J, Hanson P, Warren J . Rapid loss of an ecosystem engineer: decline in an experimentally warmed bog. Ecol Evol. 2019; 9(22):12571-12585. PMC: 6875578. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.5722. View