» Articles » PMID: 38202214

Safety and Feasibility of Intraoperative High PEEP Titrated to the Lowest Driving Pressure (ΔP)-Interim Analysis of DESIGNATION

Overview
Journal J Clin Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2024 Jan 11
PMID 38202214
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Uncertainty remains about the best level of intraoperative positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). An ongoing RCT ('DESIGNATION') compares an 'individualized high PEEP' strategy ('iPEEP')-titrated to the lowest driving pressure (ΔP) with recruitment maneuvers (RM), with a 'standard low PEEP' strategy ('low PEEP')-using 5 cm HO without RMs with respect to the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications. This report is an interim analysis of safety and feasibility. From September 2018 to July 2022, we enrolled 743 patients. Data of 698 patients were available for this analysis. Hypotension occurred more often in 'iPEEP' vs. 'low PEEP' (54.7 vs. 44.1%; RR, 1.24 (95% CI 1.07 to 1.44); < 0.01). Investigators were compliant with the study protocol 285/344 patients (82.8%) in 'iPEEP', and 345/354 patients (97.5%) in 'low PEEP' ( < 0.01). Most frequent protocol violation was missing the final RM at the end of anesthesia before extubation; PEEP titration was performed in 99.4 vs. 0%; PEEP was set correctly in 89.8 vs. 98.9%. Compared to 'low PEEP', the 'iPEEP' group was ventilated with higher PEEP (10.0 (8.0-12.0) vs. 5.0 (5.0-5.0) cm HO; < 0.01). Thus, in patients undergoing general anesthesia for open abdominal surgery, an individualized high PEEP ventilation strategy is associated with hypotension. The protocol is feasible and results in clear contrast in PEEP. DESIGNATION is expected to finish in late 2023.

Citing Articles

Driving pressure during general anesthesia for minimally invasive abdominal surgery (GENERATOR)-study protocol of a randomized clinical trial.

Trials. 2024; 25(1):719.

PMID: 39456048 PMC: 11515191. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-08479-x.

References
1.
Salmasi V, Maheshwari K, Yang D, Mascha E, Singh A, Sessler D . Relationship between Intraoperative Hypotension, Defined by Either Reduction from Baseline or Absolute Thresholds, and Acute Kidney and Myocardial Injury after Noncardiac Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis. Anesthesiology. 2016; 126(1):47-65. DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001432. View

2.
Futier E, Lefrant J, Guinot P, Godet T, Lorne E, Cuvillon P . Effect of Individualized vs Standard Blood Pressure Management Strategies on Postoperative Organ Dysfunction Among High-Risk Patients Undergoing Major Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2017; 318(14):1346-1357. PMC: 5710560. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2017.14172. View

3.
Bootsma B, Huisman D, Plat V, Schoonmade L, Stens J, Hubens G . Towards optimal intraoperative conditions in esophageal surgery: A review of literature for the prevention of esophageal anastomotic leakage. Int J Surg. 2018; 54(Pt A):113-123. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.04.045. View

4.
Canet J, Gallart L, Gomar C, Paluzie G, Valles J, Castillo J . Prediction of postoperative pulmonary complications in a population-based surgical cohort. Anesthesiology. 2010; 113(6):1338-50. DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181fc6e0a. View

5.
Monk T, Bronsert M, Henderson W, Mangione M, Sum-Ping S, Bentt D . Association between Intraoperative Hypotension and Hypertension and 30-day Postoperative Mortality in Noncardiac Surgery. Anesthesiology. 2015; 123(2):307-19. DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000756. View