» Articles » PMID: 38202110

Remote Surgical Discussion of Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease Patients Without Surgery on Site-Retrospective Insights

Overview
Journal J Clin Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2024 Jan 11
PMID 38202110
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The heart team approach is highly advocated for in treatment decision making in patients with multivessel disease (MVD). Nevertheless, many centers lack on-site cardiac surgical services (CSS)/formal heart team. Our local alternative is of remote surgical consultation without a structured image sharing platform. In our understanding, the incidence of anatomical complete revascularization (ACR) under this daily practice, and its clinical impact, has not been discussed before.

Methods: We analyzed 477 consecutive patients who were surgically revascularized between January 2009 and March 2018 for MVD, after remote surgical consultation. Unstable, late arrival, and ST elevation patients were excluded ( = 163). ACR was considered grafting all anatomic lesions > 50%. Syntax score (SS) calculation and ACR categorization were determined by an independent interventionalist using diagnostic angiograms and available operative reports ( = 267). Patients' outcomes were assessed in relation to multiple clinical variables including troponin result and the revascularization status.

Results: Three hundred and fourteen patients were included. Mean age was 64 years, and mean SS-II was 27.3 ± 11. At the 4-year follow-up, the observed mortality (11.8% and 12.9%, with troponin-positive and -negative groups, respectively), myocardial infarction (11.8%), and repeat revascularization (9.8%) were higher than those predicted using a nomogram depicting the predicted 4-year mortality as a function of the SYNTAX II Score (5.3%, 8.8%, and 3.5%, respectively, = 0.02). ACR was reported in 33% of 267 available patients' reports. After multivariate adjustment ACR was the only variable associated with a significant increase in 4-year mortality (12.3% vs. 6.7%, < 0.05).

Conclusions: Partial revascularization in the absence of on-site CSS and a structured heart team platform is a frequent occurrence. Not surprisingly, this occurrence was associated with a higher risk for mid-term mortality. An upfront, structured, virtual, heart team interface is mandatory to particularly prioritize the completeness of revascularization when considering the optimal revascularization mode.

References
1.
Teo K, Cohen E, Buller C, Hassan A, Carere R, Cox J . Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Association of Interventional Cardiology/Canadian Society of Cardiac Surgery position statement on revascularization--multivessel coronary artery disease. Can J Cardiol. 2014; 30(12):1482-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2014.09.034. View

2.
Bansilal S, Farkouh M, Hueb W, Ogdie M, Dangas G, Lansky A . The Future REvascularization Evaluation in patients with Diabetes mellitus: optimal management of Multivessel disease (FREEDOM) trial: clinical and angiographic profile at study entry. Am Heart J. 2012; 164(4):591-9. PMC: 4536808. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.06.012. View

3.
Koriat A . When are two heads better than one and why?. Science. 2012; 336(6079):360-2. DOI: 10.1126/science.1216549. View

4.
Neumann F, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, Alfonso F, Banning A, Benedetto U . 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J. 2018; 40(2):87-165. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy394. View

5.
Farooq V, Serruys P, Garcia-Garcia H, Zhang Y, Bourantas C, Holmes D . The negative impact of incomplete angiographic revascularization on clinical outcomes and its association with total occlusions: the SYNTAX (Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012; 61(3):282-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.10.017. View