» Articles » PMID: 38201631

Outlook for 615 Small Intestinal Neuroendocrine Tumor Patients: Recurrence Risk After Surgery and Disease-Specific Survival in Advanced Disease

Overview
Journal Cancers (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Oncology
Date 2024 Jan 11
PMID 38201631
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors (siNET) are one of the most common neuroendocrine neoplasms. Radical surgery is the only curative treatment.

Method: We utilized a single-center study including consecutive patients diagnosed from 2000 to 2020 and followed them until death or the end of study. Disease-specific survival and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were investigated by Cox regression analyses with the inclusion of prognostic factors. Aims/primary outcomes: We identified three groups: (1) disease specific-survival in the total cohort (group1), (2) RFS and disease-specific survival after intended radical surgery (group2), (3) disease specific-survival in patients with unresectable disease or residual tumor after primary resection (group3).

Results: In total, 615 patients, with a mean age (SD) 65 ± 11 years were included. Median (IQR) Ki-67 index was 4 (2-7)%. Median disease-specific survival in group1 was 130 months. Median RFS in group2 was 138 months with 5- and 10-year RFS rates of 72% and 59% with age, plasma chromogranin A (p-CgA) and Ki-67 index as prognostic factors. The ten year disease-specific survival rate in group2 was 86%. The median disease-specific survival in group3 was 85 months with age, Ki-67 index, p-CgA and primary tumor resection as prognostic factors. When proliferation was expressed by WHO grade, no difference was observed between G1 vs. G2 for any of the primary outcomes.

Conclusions: Recurrence rates remained high 5-10 years after surgery (group2) supporting long-term follow-up. Median disease-specific survival in patient with unresectable disease (group3) was 7 years, with a favorable impact of primary tumor resection. Our data does not support the current grading system since no significant prognostic information was detected in G1 vs. G2 tumors.

Citing Articles

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: epidemiology, genetics, and treatment.

Tan B, Zhang B, Chen H Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024; 15:1424839.

PMID: 39411312 PMC: 11474919. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1424839.

References
1.
Reinhard L, Mogl M, Benz F, Dukaczewska A, Butz F, Dobrindt E . Prognostic differences in grading and metastatic lymph node pattern in patients with small bowel neuroendocrine tumors. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023; 408(1):237. PMC: 10277262. DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-02956-8. View

2.
Kostiainen I, Karppinen N, Simonen P, Rosengard-Barlund M, Linden R, Tarkkanen M . Arterial function, biomarkers, carcinoid syndrome and carcinoid heart disease in patients with small intestinal neuroendocrine tumours. Endocrine. 2022; 77(1):177-187. PMC: 9242958. DOI: 10.1007/s12020-022-03065-0. View

3.
Dam G, Gronbaek H, Sorbye H, Thiis Evensen E, Paulsson B, Sundin A . Prospective Study of Chromogranin A as a Predictor of Progression in Patients with Pancreatic, Small-Intestinal, and Unknown Primary Neuroendocrine Tumors. Neuroendocrinology. 2019; 110(3-4):217-224. DOI: 10.1159/000503833. View

4.
Pfeifer A, Knigge U, Binderup T, Mortensen J, Oturai P, Loft A . 64Cu-DOTATATE PET for Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Prospective Head-to-Head Comparison with 111In-DTPA-Octreotide in 112 Patients. J Nucl Med. 2015; 56(6):847-54. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.156539. View

5.
Selberherr A, Freermann S, Koperek O, Niederle M, Riss P, Scheuba C . Neuroendocrine liver metastasis from the small intestine: Is surgery beneficial for survival?. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2021; 16(1):30. PMC: 7809808. DOI: 10.1186/s13023-021-01677-9. View