A Discussion and Evaluation of Statistical Procedures Used by JIMB Authors when Comparing Means
Overview
Overview
Journal
J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Specialty
Biotechnology
Date
2024 Jan 11
PMID
38200715
Authors
Authors
Affiliations
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract
Non-technical Summary: The aim of this work was to review and recommend statistical procedures for Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology authors who often compare the effect of several treatments on microorganisms and their functions.
Citing Articles
Bruni G, Terrell E, Klasson K, Qi Y J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2025; 52.
PMID: 39779298 PMC: 11744779. DOI: 10.1093/jimb/kuaf001.
References
1.
Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang A
. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009; 41(4):1149-60.
DOI: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149.
View
2.
Godara A, Rodriguez M, Weatherston J, Peabody G, Wu H, Kao K
. Beneficial mutations for carotenoid production identified from laboratory-evolved Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2019; 46(12):1793-1804.
DOI: 10.1007/s10295-019-02241-y.
View
3.
Boardman T, Moffitt D
. Graphical Monte Carlo type I error rates for multiple comparison procedures. Biometrics. 1971; 27(3):738-44.
View
4.
Ryan T
. The experiment as the unit for computing rates of error. Psychol Bull. 1962; 59:301-5.
DOI: 10.1037/h0040562.
View
5.
Tu R, Li L, Yuan H, He R, Wang Q
. Biosensor-enabled droplet microfluidic system for the rapid screening of 3-dehydroshikimic acid produced in Escherichia coli. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2020; 47(12):1155-1160.
DOI: 10.1007/s10295-020-02316-1.
View