» Articles » PMID: 38200425

Episodic Disability Questionnaire (EDQ) Measurement Properties Among Adults Living with HIV in Canada, Ireland, United Kingdom, and United States

Abstract

Background: The Episodic Disability Questionnaire (EDQ) is a generic 35-item patient-reported outcome measure of presence, severity and episodic nature of disability. We assessed the measurement properties of the Episodic Disability Questionnaire (EDQ) with adults living with HIV.

Methods: We conducted a measurement study with adults living with HIV in eight clinical settings in Canada, Ireland, United Kingdom, and United States. We electronically administered the EDQ followed by three reference measures (World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule; Patient Health Questionnaire; Social Support Scale) and a demographic questionnaire. We administered the EDQ only 1 week later. We assessed the internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha; > 0.7 acceptable), and test-retest reliability (Intra Class Correlation Coefficient; > 0.7 acceptable). We estimated required change in EDQ domain scores to be 95% certain that a change was not due to measurement error (Minimum Detectable Change (MDC95%)). We evaluated construct validity by assessing 36 primary hypotheses of relationships between EDQ scores and scores on the reference measures (> 75% hypotheses confirmed indicated validity).

Results: Three hundred fifty nine participants completed the questionnaires at time point 1, of which 321 (89%) completed the EDQ approximately 1 week later. Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency ranged from 0.84 (social domain) to 0.91 (day domain) for the EDQ severity scale, and 0.72 (uncertainty domain) to 0.88 (day domain) for the EDQ presence scale, and 0.87 (physical, cognitive, mental-emotional domains) to 0.89 (uncertainty domain) for the EDQ episodic scale. ICCs for test-retest reliability ranged from 0.79 (physical domain) to 0.88 (day domain) for the EDQ severity scale and from 0.71 (uncertainty domain) to 0.85 (day domain) for the EDQ presence scale. Highest precision was demonstrated in the severity scale for each domain (MDC95% range: 19-25 out of 100), followed by the presence (MDC95% range: 37-54) and episodic scales (MDC95% range:44-76). Twenty-nine of 36 (81%) construct validity hypotheses were confirmed.

Conclusions: The EDQ possesses internal consistency reliability, construct validity, and test-retest reliability, with limited precision when administered electronically with adults living with HIV across in clinical settings in four countries. Given the measurement properties, the EDQ can be used for group level comparisons for research and program evaluation in adults living with HIV.

Citing Articles

Disrupted HIV care during COVID-19 pandemic associated with increased disabilities among people living with HIV in Belize.

Quetzal T, Lo W, Chiu Y, Chiou H Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):3017.

PMID: 39848962 PMC: 11758069. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-85475-4.

References
1.
Prinsen C, Vohra S, Rose M, Boers M, Tugwell P, Clarke M . How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a "Core Outcome Set" - a practical guideline. Trials. 2016; 17(1):449. PMC: 5020549. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-016-1555-2. View

2.
Mokkink L, Terwee C, Knol D, Stratford P, Alonso J, Patrick D . The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: a clarification of its content. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010; 10:22. PMC: 2848183. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-22. View

3.
OBrien K, Kietrys D, Galantino M, Parrott J, Davis T, Tran Q . Reliability and Validity of the HIV Disability Questionnaire (HDQ) with Adults Living with HIV in the United States. J Int Assoc Provid AIDS Care. 2019; 18:2325958219888461. PMC: 6880031. DOI: 10.1177/2325958219888461. View

4.
Brown D, Simmons B, Boffito M, Aubry R, Nwokolo N, Harding R . Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the HIV Disability Questionnaire among adults living with HIV in the United Kingdom: A cross-sectional self-report measurement study. PLoS One. 2019; 14(7):e0213222. PMC: 6619602. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213222. View

5.
Federici S, Bracalenti M, Meloni F, Luciano J . World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0: An international systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2016; 39(23):2347-2380. DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1223177. View