» Articles » PMID: 38198239

Patient Engagement in Designing, Conducting, and Disseminating Clinical Pain Research: IMMPACT Recommended Considerations

Abstract

In the traditional clinical research model, patients are typically involved only as participants. However, there has been a shift in recent years highlighting the value and contributions that patients bring as members of the research team, across the clinical research lifecycle. It is becoming increasingly evident that to develop research that is both meaningful to people who have the targeted condition and is feasible, there are important benefits of involving patients in the planning, conduct, and dissemination of research from its earliest stages. In fact, research funders and regulatory agencies are now explicitly encouraging, and sometimes requiring, that patients are engaged as partners in research. Although this approach has become commonplace in some fields of clinical research, it remains the exception in clinical pain research. As such, the Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials convened a meeting with patient partners and international representatives from academia, patient advocacy groups, government regulatory agencies, research funding organizations, academic journals, and the biopharmaceutical industry to develop consensus recommendations for advancing patient engagement in all stages of clinical pain research in an effective and purposeful manner. This article summarizes the results of this meeting and offers considerations for meaningful and authentic engagement of patient partners in clinical pain research, including recommendations for representation, timing, continuous engagement, measurement, reporting, and research dissemination.

Citing Articles

Patient partner engagement in the publication process: challenges and possible solutions.

Cooksey K, Neuman M, Bollini M, Pennington B, de O Campos H, Oberst K BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025; 25(1):39.

PMID: 39955495 PMC: 11829384. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-025-02495-4.


Navigating the light and shadow of scientific publishing faced with machine learning and generative AI.

Palmisani F, Segelcke D, Vollert J Eur J Pain. 2024; 29(3):e4736.

PMID: 39360710 PMC: 11755395. DOI: 10.1002/ejp.4736.


Engaging clinical partners in pragmatic clinical trials: lessons learned from the pain management collaboratory.

Bastian L, Cohen S, Salsbury S, Davis A, Katsovich L, Kerns R Pain Med. 2024; 25(Supplement_1):S80-S82.

PMID: 38954840 PMC: 11548849. DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnae055.

References
1.
Abelson J, Tripp L, Kandasamy S, Burrows K . Supporting the evaluation of public and patient engagement in health system organizations: Results from an implementation research study. Health Expect. 2019; 22(5):1132-1143. PMC: 6803403. DOI: 10.1111/hex.12949. View

2.
Hamilton C, Hoens A, McKinnon A, McQuitty S, English K, Hawke L . Shortening and validation of the Patient Engagement In Research Scale (PEIRS) for measuring meaningful patient and family caregiver engagement. Health Expect. 2021; 24(3):863-879. PMC: 8235891. DOI: 10.1111/hex.13227. View

3.
Vat L, Finlay T, Robinson P, Barbareschi G, Boudes M, Diaz Ponce A . Evaluation of patient engagement in medicine development: A multi-stakeholder framework with metrics. Health Expect. 2021; 24(2):491-506. PMC: 8077089. DOI: 10.1111/hex.13191. View

4.
Taneja A, Pasqua O, Danhof M . Challenges in translational drug research in neuropathic and inflammatory pain: the prerequisites for a new paradigm. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2017; 73(10):1219-1236. PMC: 5599481. DOI: 10.1007/s00228-017-2301-8. View

5.
Klaprat N, MacIntosh A, McGavock J . Gaps in Knowledge and the Need for Patient-Partners in Research Related to Physical Activity and Type 1 Diabetes: A Narrative Review. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019; 10:42. PMC: 6372552. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00042. View