Robotic-assisted Laparoscopy in Pediatric Surgical Oncology: a Narrative Review

Overview

Journal Transl Pediatr

Publisher AME Publishing Company

Specialty Pediatrics

Date 2024 Jan 10

PMID 38197107

Authors

Nicolas Vinit

Sabine Sarnacki

Thomas Blanc

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background And Objective: Robotic surgical oncology in children calls for experienced surgeons in minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and a solid oncological background. The aim of this review was to analyze the current state of robotic-assisted laparoscopy in pediatric tumor resection, assess the necessary framework of minimally invasive surgical oncology and describe future developments of the robotic technology.

Methods: A literature search of the MEDLINE/PubMed database was conducted, using the terms "robotic surgery", "pediatric" or "children" and "oncology" or "tumor". All relevant English-language studies published between 2008 and 2022 were reviewed.

Key Content And Findings: Although concerns have been raised regarding the use of MIS in surgical oncology, current literature reports similar oncological outcome if surgeons comply with the oncologic principles. The benefits of MIS have been established for robotic surgery in adult studies, including a shorter time to adjuvant chemotherapy. Surgical feasibility should be assessed based on tumor characteristics, preoperative imaging focusing on vascular involvement and surgeon's experience until clear guidelines are issued. The difficulties in establishing eligibility criteria for robotic resection of pediatric tumors lie in the great variability of indications, heterogeneity in tumor histology with their own surgical specificities, and wide range of age and weight, as shown by the literature review we performed. Between 2008 and 2022, 31 studies reported 171 cases with three studies including at least ten patients. The most reported procedure was adrenalectomy (41 cases). Current research in pediatric surgical oncology focuses on intraoperative locoregional treatment, improved vision with fluorescence and dyed-loaded specific probes and the many possibilities of enhancement software using the robotic console.

Conclusions: The robotic technology allows the surgeon to push the boundaries of conventional laparoscopy. Specific surgical guidelines are necessary.

References

Meehan J, Sandler A . Pediatric robotic surgery: A single-institutional review of the first 100 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc. 2007; 22(1):177-82. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-007-9418-2. View

Martelli H, Ricard M, Larroquet M, Wioland M, Paraf F, Fabre M . Intraoperative localization of neuroblastoma in children with 123I- or 125I-radiolabeled metaiodobenzylguanidine. Surgery. 1998; 123(1):51-7. View

Krebs T, Egberts J, Lorenzen U, Krause M, Reischig K, Meiksans R . Robotic infant surgery with 3 mm instruments: a study in piglets of less than 10 kg body weight. J Robot Surg. 2021; 16(1):215-228. PMC: 8863694. DOI: 10.1007/s11701-021-01229-0. View

Vining C, Kuchta K, Berger Y, Paterakos P, Schuitevoerder D, Roggin K . Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy decreases the risk of clinically relevant post-operative pancreatic fistula: a propensity score matched NSQIP analysis. HPB (Oxford). 2020; 23(3):367-378. DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.07.004. View

Esposito C, Settimi A, Del Conte F, Cerulo M, Coppola V, Farina A . Image-Guided Pediatric Surgery Using Indocyanine Green (ICG) Fluorescence in Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgery. Front Pediatr. 2020; 8:314. PMC: 7311575. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2020.00314. View

Jung Y, Kang J, Park E, Baik S, Lee K . Time to Initiation of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Colon Cancer: Comparison of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2016; 26(10):799-805. DOI: 10.1089/lap.2016.0293. View

Warmann S, Fuchs J, Jesch N, Schrappe M, Ure B . A prospective study of minimally invasive techniques in pediatric surgical oncology: preliminary report. Med Pediatr Oncol. 2003; 40(3):155-7. DOI: 10.1002/mpo.10234. View

Brisse H, McCarville M, Granata C, Krug K, Wootton-Gorges S, Kanegawa K . Guidelines for imaging and staging of neuroblastic tumors: consensus report from the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group Project. Radiology. 2011; 261(1):243-57. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.11101352. View

Virzi A, Muller C, Marret J, Mille E, Berteloot L, Grevent D . Comprehensive Review of 3D Segmentation Software Tools for MRI Usable for Pelvic Surgery Planning. J Digit Imaging. 2019; 33(1):99-110. PMC: 7064712. DOI: 10.1007/s10278-019-00239-7. View

10.

Waters J, Canal D, Wiebke E, Dumas R, Beane J, Aguilar-Saavedra J . Robotic distal pancreatectomy: cost effective?. Surgery. 2010; 148(4):814-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2010.07.027. View

11.

Barbosa J, Barayan G, Gridley C, Sanchez D, Passerotti C, Houck C . Parent and patient perceptions of robotic vs open urological surgery scars in children. J Urol. 2013; 190(1):244-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.12.060. View

12.

Kinahan K, Sharp L, Seidel K, Leisenring W, Didwania A, Lacouture M . Scarring, disfigurement, and quality of life in long-term survivors of childhood cancer: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor study. J Clin Oncol. 2012; 30(20):2466-74. PMC: 3397782. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2011.39.3611. View

13.

Galazka P, Czyzewski K, Marjanska A, Daniluk-Matras I, Styczynski J . Minimally Invasive Surgery in Pediatric Oncology: Proposal of Guidelines. Anticancer Res. 2019; 39(11):5853-5859. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.13789. View

14.

Esposito C, Autorino G, Castagnetti M, Cerulo M, Coppola V, Cardone R . Robotics and future technical developments in pediatric urology. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2021; 30(4):151082. DOI: 10.1016/j.sempedsurg.2021.151082. View

15.

Andras I, Mazzone E, van Leeuwen F, De Naeyer G, van Oosterom M, Beato S . Artificial intelligence and robotics: a combination that is changing the operating room. World J Urol. 2019; 38(10):2359-2366. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-03037-6. View

16.

Michiels C, Khene Z, Prudhomme T, Boulenger de Hauteclocque A, Cornelis F, Percot M . 3D-Image guided robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy: a multi-institutional propensity score-matched analysis (UroCCR study 51). World J Urol. 2021; 41(2):303-313. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-021-03645-1. View

17.

Qadan M, Kingham T . Technical Aspects of Gallbladder Cancer Surgery. Surg Clin North Am. 2016; 96(2):229-45. PMC: 4907326. DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2015.12.007. View

18.

Kenney P, Tuerk I . Complications of laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in testicular cancer. World J Urol. 2008; 26(6):561-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-008-0299-3. View

19.

Luzzi L, Corzani R, Ghisalberti M, Meniconi F, De Leonibus L, Molinaro F . Robotic surgery vs. open surgery for thymectomy, a retrospective case-match study. J Robot Surg. 2020; 15(3):375-379. DOI: 10.1007/s11701-020-01109-z. View

20.

Brown C, Sebastiao Y, Zann A, McLeod D, DaJusta D . Utilization of robotics for retroperitoneal lymph-node dissection in pediatric and non-pediatric hospitals. J Robot Surg. 2020; 14(6):865-870. DOI: 10.1007/s11701-020-01066-7. View