» Articles » PMID: 38196127

Cost-effectiveness of Catheter-based Radiofrequency Renal Denervation for the Treatment of Uncontrolled Hypertension: an Analysis for the UK Based on Recent Clinical Evidence

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims: Catheter-based radiofrequency renal denervation (RF RDN) has recently been approved for clinical use in the European Society of Hypertension guidelines and by the US Food and Drug Administration. This study evaluated the lifetime cost-effectiveness of RF RDN using contemporary evidence.

Methods And Results: A decision-analytic model based on multivariate risk equations projected clinical events, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and costs. The model consisted of seven health states: hypertension alone, myocardial infarction (MI), other symptomatic coronary artery disease, stroke, heart failure (HF), end-stage renal disease, and death. Risk reduction associated with changes in office systolic blood pressure (oSBP) was estimated based on a published meta-regression of hypertension trials. The base case effect size of -4.9 mmHg oSBP (observed vs. sham control) was taken from the SPYRAL HTN-ON MED trial of 337 patients. Costs were based on National Health Service England data. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was evaluated against the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) cost-effectiveness threshold of £20 000-30 000 per QALY gained. Extensive scenario and sensitivity analyses were conducted, including the ON-MED subgroup on three medications and pooled effect sizes. RF RDN resulted in a relative risk reduction in clinical events over 10 years (0.80 for stroke, 0.88 for MI, 0.72 for HF), with an increase in health benefit over a patient's lifetime, adding 0.35 QALYs at a cost of £4763, giving an ICER of £13 482 per QALY gained. Findings were robust across tested scenarios.

Conclusion: Catheter-based radiofrequency RDN can be a cost-effective strategy for uncontrolled hypertension in the UK, with an ICER substantially below the NICE cost-effectiveness threshold.

Citing Articles

Balancing Affordability and Need: Should We Use Renal Denervation in Hypertension Management?.

Lauder L, Burkard T, Mahfoud F J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2024; 3(10):102248.

PMID: 39525999 PMC: 11549516. DOI: 10.1016/j.jscai.2024.102248.


Catheter-Based Radiofrequency Renal Denervation in the United States: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Based on Contemporary Evidence.

Kandzari D, Cao K, Ryschon A, Sharp A, Pietzsch J J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2024; 3(10):102234.

PMID: 39525984 PMC: 11549517. DOI: 10.1016/j.jscai.2024.102234.


Cost-Effectiveness of Radiofrequency Renal Denervation for Uncontrolled Hypertension in Japan.

Kario K, Cao K, Tanaka Y, Ryschon A, Pietzsch J J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2024; 26(12):1502-1512.

PMID: 39503996 PMC: 11654850. DOI: 10.1111/jch.14922.

References
1.
Voss R, Cullen P, Schulte H, Assmann G . Prediction of risk of coronary events in middle-aged men in the Prospective Cardiovascular Münster Study (PROCAM) using neural networks. Int J Epidemiol. 2003; 31(6):1253-62; discussion 1262-64. DOI: 10.1093/ije/31.6.1253. View

2.
Cushman W, Evans G, Byington R, Goff Jr D, Grimm Jr R, Cutler J . Effects of intensive blood-pressure control in type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 2010; 362(17):1575-85. PMC: 4123215. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1001286. View

3.
Schmieder R, Mahfoud F, Mancia G, Azizi M, Bohm M, Dimitriadis K . European Society of Hypertension position paper on renal denervation 2021. J Hypertens. 2021; 39(9):1733-1741. DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002933. View

4.
Gorodetskaya I, Zenios S, McCulloch C, Bostrom A, Hsu C, Bindman A . Health-related quality of life and estimates of utility in chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2005; 68(6):2801-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00752.x. View

5.
Mahfoud F, Bohm M, Schmieder R, Narkiewicz K, Ewen S, Ruilope L . Effects of renal denervation on kidney function and long-term outcomes: 3-year follow-up from the Global SYMPLICITY Registry. Eur Heart J. 2019; 40(42):3474-3482. PMC: 6837160. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz118. View