» Articles » PMID: 38192225

Use of the Capability, Opportunity and Motivation Behaviour Model (COM-B) to Understand Interventions to Support Physical Activity Behaviour in People with Stroke: An Overview of Reviews

Overview
Journal Clin Rehabil
Publisher Sage Publications
Date 2024 Jan 9
PMID 38192225
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Physical activity in people with stroke remains low despite considerable research. This overview aimed to provide high-level synthesis and aid clinical decision-making. The Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behaviour (COM-B) model was used to classify interventions to understand which components improve physical activity behaviour in people with stroke.

Data Sources: CINAHL, Cochrane Database, MEDLINE, PEDro, PsychINFO, SPORTDiscus.

Review Methods: A systematic search was conducted (November 2023) to identify reviews of interventions to improve physical activity in people with stroke. Results were screened and assessed for eligibility. Participant characteristics, intervention classification using COM-B, and effect of intervention were extracted. Quality was assessed using AMSTAR2, and Corrected Cover Analysis for study overlap. Narrative synthesis was used to understand components of interventions to improve physical activity behaviour.

Results: 1801 references were screened and 29 full-text references assessed for eligibility. Twenty reviews were included. Quality ranged from critically low ( = 3) to high ( = 10). Study overlap calculated using corrected cover area indicated slight overlap (0.028) and minimal reporting bias.The majority of participants were mobile with mild stroke and community dwelling. Twenty-three interventions were classified using COM-B. Three of twelve interventions classified to one aspect of the COM-B were effective. Fourteen of sixteen effective interventions combined at least two COM-B elements, ten of these combined capability and motivation.

Conclusion: Interventions including at least two elements of the COM-B are most likely to improve physical activity in mobile stroke survivors. Further research is needed to understand physical activity behaviour in those with moderate to severe stroke.

Citing Articles

Can Lp(a) become the next A1C? A case for digital health management tools to overcome inertia to Lipoprotein (a) testing.

Wedemeyer C, Peters M, Jones G Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025; 12:1545787.

PMID: 39995970 PMC: 11849046. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1545787.


Barriers and facilitators to improved sedentary behaviour in coronary heart disease patients: a scoping review.

Yang Y, Yuan Q, Wu C, Yang L BMJ Open. 2025; 15(1):e088111.

PMID: 39880456 PMC: 11781147. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088111.


Depression and anxiety in people with kidney disease: understanding symptom variability, patient experience and preferences for mental health support.

Chilcot J, Pearce C, Hall N, Rehman Z, Norton S, Griffiths S J Nephrol. 2025; .

PMID: 39799543 DOI: 10.1007/s40620-024-02194-1.


Influences on the physical activity behaviour of inpatients after stroke outside of staff-led rehabilitation sessions: a systematic review.

Hartley P, Bond K, Dance R, Kuhn I, McPeake J, Forsyth F Clin Rehabil. 2024; 39(1):109-127.

PMID: 39523528 PMC: 11776358. DOI: 10.1177/02692155241293269.


A profile approach to physical activity levels: what's intensity got to do with reasons and motives for exercise?.

Kercher V, Burton D, Kercher K, Heeter K, Brunnemer J, Watkins J BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):2990.

PMID: 39472887 PMC: 11520888. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-20449-1.

References
1.
Pogrebnoy D, Dennett A . Exercise Programs Delivered According to Guidelines Improve Mobility in People With Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019; 101(1):154-165. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.06.015. View

2.
McEwan D, Beauchamp M, Kouvousis C, Ray C, Wyrough A, Rhodes R . Examining the active ingredients of physical activity interventions underpinned by theory versus no stated theory: a meta-analysis. Health Psychol Rev. 2018; 13(1):1-17. DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2018.1547120. View

3.
Kringle E, Gibbs B, Campbell G, McCue M, Terhorst L, Kersey J . Influence of Interventions on Daily Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior after Stroke: A Systematic Review. PM R. 2019; 12(2):186-201. DOI: 10.1002/pmrj.12222. View

4.
Shea B, Reeves B, Wells G, Thuku M, Hamel C, Moran J . AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ. 2017; 358:j4008. PMC: 5833365. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.j4008. View

5.
Sahely A, Giles D, Sintler C, Soundy A, Rosewilliam S . Self-management interventions to improve mobility after stroke: an integrative review. Disabil Rehabil. 2022; 45(1):9-26. DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2028019. View