» Articles » PMID: 38191869

Sound Localization in Noisy Contexts: Performance, Metacognitive Evaluations and Head Movements

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 2024 Jan 9
PMID 38191869
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Localizing sounds in noisy environments can be challenging. Here, we reproduce real-life soundscapes to investigate the effects of environmental noise on sound localization experience. We evaluated participants' performance and metacognitive assessments, including measures of sound localization effort and confidence, while also tracking their spontaneous head movements. Normal-hearing participants (N = 30) were engaged in a speech-localization task conducted in three common soundscapes that progressively increased in complexity: nature, traffic, and a cocktail party setting. To control visual information and measure behaviors, we used visual virtual reality technology. The results revealed that the complexity of the soundscape had an impact on both performance errors and metacognitive evaluations. Participants reported increased effort and reduced confidence for sound localization in more complex noise environments. On the contrary, the level of soundscape complexity did not influence the use of spontaneous exploratory head-related behaviors. We also observed that, irrespective of the noisy condition, participants who implemented a higher number of head rotations and explored a wider extent of space by rotating their heads made lower localization errors. Interestingly, we found preliminary evidence that an increase in spontaneous head movements, specifically the extent of head rotation, leads to a decrease in perceived effort and an increase in confidence at the single-trial level. These findings expand previous observations regarding sound localization in noisy environments by broadening the perspective to also include metacognitive evaluations, exploratory behaviors and their interactions.

Citing Articles

Action toward sound sources enhances auditory spatial confidence: on the metacognitive consequences of reaching to sounds.

Valzolgher C, Lever L, Rosi T, Pavani F Psychol Res. 2025; 89(1):48.

PMID: 39827425 PMC: 11743395. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-025-02079-3.


Previous binaural experience supports compensatory strategies in hearing-impaired children's auditory horizontal localization.

Gulli A, Fontana F, Aruffo A, Orzan E, Muzzi E PLoS One. 2024; 19(12):e0312073.

PMID: 39637020 PMC: 11620673. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312073.

References
1.
Pichora-Fuller M, Kramer S, Eckert M, Edwards B, Hornsby B, Humes L . Hearing Impairment and Cognitive Energy: The Framework for Understanding Effortful Listening (FUEL). Ear Hear. 2016; 37 Suppl 1:5S-27S. DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000312. View

2.
Coudert A, Gaveau V, Gatel J, Verdelet G, Salemme R, Farne A . Spatial Hearing Difficulties in Reaching Space in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Children Improve With Head Movements. Ear Hear. 2021; 43(1):192-205. PMC: 8694251. DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001090. View

3.
Kurzban R, Duckworth A, Kable J, Myers J . An opportunity cost model of subjective effort and task performance. Behav Brain Sci. 2013; 36(6):661-79. PMC: 3856320. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X12003196. View

4.
Giovanelli E, Valzolgher C, Gessa E, Todeschini M, Pavani F . Unmasking the Difficulty of Listening to Talkers With Masks: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic. Iperception. 2022; 12(2):2041669521998393. PMC: 8822309. DOI: 10.1177/2041669521998393. View

5.
Lorenzi C, Gatehouse S, Lever C . Sound localization in noise in normal-hearing listeners. J Acoust Soc Am. 1999; 105(3):1810-20. DOI: 10.1121/1.426719. View