» Articles » PMID: 38191805

Adenoma Location, Size, and Morphology Are Risk Factors for FOBT False-negative Results in Inpatients with Advanced Colorectal Adenoma

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2024 Jan 9
PMID 38191805
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Recently, advanced adenoma (AA) has been recognized as a target for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. However, the fecal occult blood test (FOBT), the primary non-invasive screening method, shows limited sensitivity in detecting AA. This study investigates the relationship between adenoma characteristics and FOBT false-negative results. In a retrospective cohort study conducted from 2015 to 2022, we examined 342 inpatients with AA who underwent colonoscopy and received qualitative FOBT. FOBT sensitivity was analyzed about various adenoma characteristics, and logistic regression models were employed to investigate the relationship between adenoma features and FOBT false-negative outcomes. FOBT sensitivity in AA inpatients was 52.63%. Significant differences in sensitivity were observed based on adenoma location (left vs. right), morphology (with or without pedunculation), and size (≤ 10 mm vs. > 10 mm). After adjusting for several potential confounders, FOBT showed a reduced false-negative rate in AA with large-sized (OR, 0.49; 95% CI 0.31-0.77), left-sided location (OR, 0.53; 95% CI 0.31-0.89), and pedunculated morphology (OR, 0.73; 95% CI 0.43-1.24). AA with large size, left-sided location, and pedunculated morphology independently contribute to a decreased rate of FOBT false-negative results. However, these adenoma characteristics are not actively modifiable. Therefore, novel non-invasive methods are needed to improve AA detection accuracy.

Citing Articles

Utility of Stool-Based Tests for Colorectal Cancer Detection: A Comprehensive Review.

Gomez-Molina R, Suarez M, Martinez R, Chilet M, Bauca J, Mateo J Healthcare (Basel). 2024; 12(16).

PMID: 39201203 PMC: 11353969. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12161645.

References
1.
de Klerk C, Vendrig L, Bossuyt P, Dekker E . Participant-Related Risk Factors for False-Positive and False-Negative Fecal Immunochemical Tests in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2018; 113(12):1778-1787. PMC: 6768609. DOI: 10.1038/s41395-018-0212-7. View

2.
Park D, Ryu S, Kim Y, Lee S, Lee C, Eun C . Comparison of guaiac-based and quantitative immunochemical fecal occult blood testing in a population at average risk undergoing colorectal cancer screening. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010; 105(9):2017-25. DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2010.179. View

3.
Hunt J, Cock C, Symonds E . A True Positive and a False Negative? The Dilemma of Negative Colonoscopy After a Positive Fecal Occult Blood Test. Dig Dis Sci. 2021; 67(5):1843-1849. DOI: 10.1007/s10620-021-06986-4. View

4.
Baidoun F, Elshiwy K, Elkeraie Y, Merjaneh Z, Khoudari G, Sarmini M . Colorectal Cancer Epidemiology: Recent Trends and Impact on Outcomes. Curr Drug Targets. 2020; 22(9):998-1009. DOI: 10.2174/1389450121999201117115717. View

5.
Kim N, Park J, Park D, Sohn C, Choi K, Jung Y . Risk Factors for False Fecal Immunochemical Test Results in Colorectal Cancer Screening. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2016; 51(2):151-159. DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000588. View