» Articles » PMID: 38191258

Risk Factors for SARS-CoV-2 Infection: a Test-negative Case-control Study with Additional Population Controls in Norway

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to assess risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection by combined design; first comparing positive cases to negative controls as determined by PCR testing and then comparing these two groups to an additional prepandemic population control group.

Design And Setting: Test-negative design (TND), multicentre case-control study with additional population controls in South-Eastern Norway.

Participants: Adults who underwent SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing between February and December 2020. PCR-positive cases, PCR-negative controls and additional age-matched population controls.

Primary Outcome Measures: The associations between various risk factors based on self- reported questionnaire and SARS-CoV-2 infection comparing PCR-positive cases and PCR-negative controls. Using subgroup analysis, the risk factors for both PCR-positive and PCR-negative participants were compared with a population control group.

Results: In total, 400 PCR-positive cases, 719 PCR-negative controls and 14 509 population controls were included. Male sex was associated with the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection only in the TND study (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.4 to 2.6), but not when PCR-positive cases were compared with population controls (OR 1.2, 95% CI 0.9. to 1.5). Some factors were positively (asthma, wood heating) or negatively (hypertension) associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection when PCR-positive cases were compared with population controls, but lacked convincing association in the TND study. Smoking was negatively associated with the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection in both analyses (OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.3 to 0.8 and OR 0.6, 95% CI 0.4 to 0.8).

Conclusions: Male sex was a possible risk factor for SARS-CoV-2 infection only in the TND study, whereas smoking was negatively associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection in both the TND study and when using population controls. Several factors were associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection when PCR-positive cases were compared with population controls, but not in the TND study, highlighting the strength of combining case-control study designs during the pandemic.

References
1.
Simons D, Shahab L, Brown J, Perski O . The association of smoking status with SARS-CoV-2 infection, hospitalization and mortality from COVID-19: a living rapid evidence review with Bayesian meta-analyses (version 7). Addiction. 2020; 116(6):1319-1368. PMC: 7590402. DOI: 10.1111/add.15276. View

2.
Magdy Beshbishy A, Oti V, Hussein D, Rehan I, Adeyemi O, Rivero-Perez N . Factors Behind the Higher COVID-19 Risk in Diabetes: A Critical Review. Front Public Health. 2021; 9:591982. PMC: 8292635. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.591982. View

3.
Caspersen I, Magnus P, Trogstad L . Excess risk and clusters of symptoms after COVID-19 in a large Norwegian cohort. Eur J Epidemiol. 2022; 37(5):539-548. PMC: 8872922. DOI: 10.1007/s10654-022-00847-8. View

4.
Benowitz N, Goniewicz M, Halpern-Felsher B, Krishnan-Sarin S, Ling P, OConnor R . Tobacco product use and the risks of SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19: current understanding and recommendations for future research. Lancet Respir Med. 2022; 10(9):900-915. PMC: 9381032. DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(22)00182-5. View

5.
Dickerman B, Gerlovin H, Madenci A, Kurgansky K, Ferolito B, Figueroa Muniz M . Comparative Effectiveness of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 Vaccines in U.S. Veterans. N Engl J Med. 2021; 386(2):105-115. PMC: 8693691. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2115463. View