Importance of Continuity of Care from a Patient Perspective - a Cross-sectional Study in Swedish Health Care

Overview

Journal Scand J Prim Health Care

Specialty Public Health

Date 2024 Jan 8

PMID 38189945

Authors

Ebba Cohen

Ida Lindman

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the patients' view on continuity of care (CoC), including preference for a certain general practitioner (GP) and importance and access to a regular general practitioner (RGP).

Design: Cross-sectional study.

Setting: Primary care center in Halland County, in the western part of Sweden.

Subjects: Patients ≥18 years old and having at least one appointment at the primary care center during October-December 2022.

Main Outcome Measures: Preference for a certain GP and importance of and accessibility for an RGP.

Results: The study included 404 patients. Importance of having an RGP was considered by 86% of the patients. Preference for a certain GP was thought by 73% of the patients, and when asked as a bivariate question, 69% considered having an RGP. Both the importance of an RGP and preference for a certain GP were more often considered by patients ≥65 years ( < .0001). Regarding accessibility, 67% of the patients reported having access to their RGP 'always/most of the time or a lot of the time' and 62% reported seeing their RGP at last visit.

Conclusions: In conclusion, this study showed that the majority of patients value CoC in terms of importance of having an RGP. Older patients were more likely to have a preference for a certain GP. Two-third of the patients succeeded in seeing their RGP always or a lot of the time. The results in this study provide evidence that CoC is important for most patients, regardless of age and gender.Key pointsPrevious studies have showed that continuity of care (CoC) is important regarding mortality and morbidity. In primary care, there is a current debate regarding CoC, accessibility and the strive for CoC. This study showed that the majority of patients, regardless of age and gender, value CoC and consider it being important. However, there was a statistically significant difference regarding age, where patients above 65 years old thought it was more important to have a regular general practitioner and more often had a preference for a certain GP.

Citing Articles

Exploring Men's Experiences of Engagement With General Practice: A Qualitative Study.

Mursa R, Patterson C, McErlean G, Halcomb E J Prim Care Community Health. 2025; 16:21501319251318447.

PMID: 39912703 PMC: 11803725. DOI: 10.1177/21501319251318447.

The future of general practice and family medicine in Austria.

Rabady S Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2024; 137(3-4):105-108.

PMID: 39107616 PMC: 11794389. DOI: 10.1007/s00508-024-02422-5.

Multimorbidity and patient experience with general practice: A national cross-sectional survey in Norway.

Norman R, Jelin E, Bjertnaes O BMC Prim Care. 2024; 25(1):249.

PMID: 38987692 PMC: 11238367. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-024-02495-1.

On sustainability and low value care.

Petursson H, Tomasdottir M Scand J Prim Health Care. 2024; 42(2):235-236.

PMID: 38416128 PMC: 11003313. DOI: 10.1080/02813432.2024.2321525.

References

Paddison C, Abel G, Roland M, Elliott M, Lyratzopoulos G, Campbell J . Drivers of overall satisfaction with primary care: evidence from the English General Practice Patient Survey. Health Expect. 2013; 18(5):1081-92. PMC: 5060812. DOI: 10.1111/hex.12081. View

Mainous 3rd A, Baker R, Love M, Gray D, Gill J . Continuity of care and trust in one's physician: evidence from primary care in the United States and the United Kingdom. Fam Med. 2001; 33(1):22-7. View

Engstrom S, Borgquist L, Nordvall D, Albinsson G, Arvidsson E . [Personal physician continuity in primary care associated with fewer emergency room visits]. Lakartidningen. 2019; 116. View

Ljungholm L, Edin-Liljegren A, Ekstedt M, Klinga C . What is needed for continuity of care and how can we achieve it? - Perceptions among multiprofessionals on the chronic care trajectory. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022; 22(1):686. PMC: 9125858. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08023-0. View

von Bultzingslowen I, Eliasson G, Sarvimaki A, Mattsson B, Hjortdahl P . Patients' views on interpersonal continuity in primary care: a sense of security based on four core foundations. Fam Pract. 2005; 23(2):210-9. DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmi103. View

Sandvik H, Hetlevik O, Blinkenberg J, Hunskaar S . Continuity in general practice as predictor of mortality, acute hospitalisation, and use of out-of-hours care: a registry-based observational study in Norway. Br J Gen Pract. 2021; 72(715):e84-e90. PMC: 8510690. DOI: 10.3399/BJGP.2021.0340. View

McWhinney I . Primary care: core values. Core values in a changing world. BMJ. 1998; 316(7147):1807-9. PMC: 1113320. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.316.7147.1807. View

Chan K, Wan E, Chin W, Cheng W, Ho M, Yu E . Effects of continuity of care on health outcomes among patients with diabetes mellitus and/or hypertension: a systematic review. BMC Fam Pract. 2021; 22(1):145. PMC: 8254900. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-021-01493-x. View

Murphy M, Salisbury C . Relational continuity and patients' perception of GP trust and respect: a qualitative study. Br J Gen Pract. 2020; 70(698):e676-e683. PMC: 7425201. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20X712349. View

10.

Hansen A, Halvorsen P, Aaraas I, Forde O . Continuity of GP care is related to reduced specialist healthcare use: a cross-sectional survey. Br J Gen Pract. 2013; 63(612):482-9. PMC: 3693805. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp13X669202. View

11.

Bazemore A, Petterson S, Peterson L, Bruno R, Chung Y, Phillips Jr R . Higher Primary Care Physician Continuity is Associated With Lower Costs and Hospitalizations. Ann Fam Med. 2018; 16(6):492-497. PMC: 6231930. DOI: 10.1370/afm.2308. View

12.

Tammes P, Morris R, Murphy M, Salisbury C . Is continuity of primary care declining in England? Practice-level longitudinal study from 2012 to 2017. Br J Gen Pract. 2021; 71(707):e432-e440. PMC: 8103927. DOI: 10.3399/BJGP.2020.0935. View

13.

Lautamatti E, Sumanen M, Raivio R, Mattila K . Continuity of care is associated with satisfaction with local health care services. BMC Fam Pract. 2020; 21(1):181. PMC: 7487808. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-020-01251-5. View

14.

Wright M, Mainous 3rd A . Can continuity of care in primary care be sustained in the modern health system?. Aust J Gen Pract. 2019; 47(10):667-669. DOI: 10.31128/AJGP-06-18-4618. View

15.

Nutting P, Goodwin M, Flocke S, Zyzanski S, Stange K . Continuity of primary care: to whom does it matter and when?. Ann Fam Med. 2004; 1(3):149-55. PMC: 1466596. DOI: 10.1370/afm.63. View

16.

Aboulghate A, Abel G, Elliott M, Parker R, Campbell J, Lyratzopoulos G . Do English patients want continuity of care, and do they receive it?. Br J Gen Pract. 2012; 62(601):e567-75. PMC: 3404335. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp12X653624. View

17.

Kiran T, Green M, Bai L, Latifovic L, Khan S, Kopp A . Relational Continuity, Physician Payment, and Team-Based Primary Care in the Canadian Health Care System. J Am Board Fam Med. 2023; 36(1):130-141. DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2022.220235R1. View

18.

Stokes T, Tarrant C, Mainous 3rd A, Schers H, Freeman G, Baker R . Continuity of care: is the personal doctor still important? A survey of general practitioners and family physicians in England and Wales, the United States, and The Netherlands. Ann Fam Med. 2005; 3(4):353-9. PMC: 1466891. DOI: 10.1370/afm.351. View

19.

Romano M, Segal J, Pollack C . The Association Between Continuity of Care and the Overuse of Medical Procedures. JAMA Intern Med. 2015; 175(7):1148-54. PMC: 5577558. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.1340. View

20.

Kohnke H, Zielinski A . Association between continuity of care in Swedish primary care and emergency services utilisation: a population-based cross-sectional study. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2017; 35(2):113-119. PMC: 5499310. DOI: 10.1080/02813432.2017.1333303. View