» Articles » PMID: 38188534

What's in This For You? What's in This For Me?: A Win-Win Perspective of Involving Study Advisory Committee Members in Palliative Care Research

Abstract

Study advisory committees (SACs) provide critical value to clinical trials by providing unique perspectives that pull from personal and professional experiences related to the trial's healthcare topic. The Emergency Medicine Palliative Care Access (EMPallA) study had the privilege of convening a 16-person SAC from the project's inception to completion. The study team wanted to understand the impact this project had on the SAC members. In this narrative, we use reflective dialogue to share SAC members' lived experiences and the impact the EMPallA study has had on members both personally and professionally. We detail the (1) benefits SAC members, specifically patients, and caregivers, have had through working on this project. (2) The importance of recruiting diverse SAC members with different lived experiences and leveraging their feedback in clinical research. (3) Value of community capacity building to ensure the common vision of the clinical trial is promoted.

Citing Articles

Implementing Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute Stakeholder Engagement Principles in Models of Palliative Care Delivery and Advance Care Planning Research.

Walling A, Verma M, Grudzen C, Enguidanos S, Barrett N, Johnson K Med Care. 2024; 62(10):693-700.

PMID: 39245817 PMC: 11373890. DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000002025.

References
1.
Manafo E, Petermann L, Vandall-Walker V, Mason-Lai P . Patient and public engagement in priority setting: A systematic rapid review of the literature. PLoS One. 2018; 13(3):e0193579. PMC: 5834195. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193579. View

2.
Kelly G, Wang S, Lucas G, Fraenkel L, Gross C . Facilitating Meaningful Engagement on Community Advisory Committees in Patient-Centered Outcome Research. Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2017; 11(3):243-251. PMC: 5679445. DOI: 10.1353/cpr.2017.0029. View

3.
Frank L, Forsythe L, Ellis L, Schrandt S, Sheridan S, Gerson J . Conceptual and practical foundations of patient engagement in research at the patient-centered outcomes research institute. Qual Life Res. 2015; 24(5):1033-41. PMC: 4412554. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-014-0893-3. View

4.
de Forcrand C, Flannery M, Cho J, Pidatala N, Batra R, Booker-Vaughns J . Pragmatic Considerations in Incorporating Stakeholder Engagement Into a Palliative Care Transitions Study. Med Care. 2021; 59(Suppl 4):S370-S378. PMC: 8263137. DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001583. View

5.
Grudzen C, Shim D, Schmucker A, Cho J, Goldfeld K . Emergency Medicine Palliative Care Access (EMPallA): protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of specialty outpatient versus nurse-led telephonic palliative care of older adults with advanced illness. BMJ Open. 2019; 9(1):e025692. PMC: 6347856. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025692. View