» Articles » PMID: 38188480

Detection of Zoonotic Spp. in Small Wild Rodents Using Amplicon-based Next-generation Sequencing

Overview
Specialty Parasitology
Date 2024 Jan 8
PMID 38188480
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Rodents may serve as reservoirs of zoonotic species of ; however, data from molecular surveys in support of this hypothesis are still scarce. In this study, we screened faeces and rectal content from murid and cricetid rodents ( = 58) caught around three farms in Zealand, Denmark, for spp. by amplicon-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) of ribosomal genes. Selected samples were further examined using nested conventional PCR targeting SSU rRNA, gp60, and actin genes. specific DNA was identified in 40/58 (69%) samples, and in 12 (30%) of the 40 positive animals, mixed cryptosporidial infections were observed. was the species most commonly identified, found in 28 (48%) of the animals. was identified in 4 (7%) of the animals, all of which were co-infected with . The present study is the first to utilize NGS-based screening for species in wild rodents. Moreover, it is the first study to provide molecular data on in rodents sampled in Denmark and to detect DNA of in and The NGS approach was successfully applied to yield new knowledge, and the results showed that zoonotic species of are common in murid and cricetid rodents in Zealand, Denmark.

Citing Articles

Rodent-adapted infection in humans: Seven new cases and review of the literature.

Stensvold C, Larsen T, Gruttner J, Nielsen L, Engberg J, Lebbad M One Health. 2024; 18:100682.

PMID: 39010954 PMC: 11247268. DOI: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2024.100682.

References
1.
Stensvold C, Lebbad M, Hansen A, Beser J, Belkessa S, Andersen L . Differentiation of and parasitic archamoebids encountered in untreated wastewater samples by amplicon-based next-generation sequencing. Parasite Epidemiol Control. 2020; 9:e00131. PMC: 6940715. DOI: 10.1016/j.parepi.2019.e00131. View

2.
Gharieb R, Bowman D, Liotta J, Xiao L . Isolation, genotyping and subtyping of single Cryptosporidium oocysts from calves with special reference to zoonotic significance. Vet Parasitol. 2019; 271:80-86. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2019.05.003. View

3.
Garcia-Livia K, Fernandez-Alvarez A, Feliu C, Miquel J, Quilichini Y, Foronda P . Cryptosporidium spp. in wild murids (Rodentia) from Corsica, France. Parasitol Res. 2021; 121(1):345-354. PMC: 8748365. DOI: 10.1007/s00436-021-07369-4. View

4.
Sulaiman I, Lal A, Xiao L . Molecular phylogeny and evolutionary relationships of Cryptosporidium parasites at the actin locus. J Parasitol. 2002; 88(2):388-94. DOI: 10.1645/0022-3395(2002)088[0388:MPAERO]2.0.CO;2. View

5.
Koskela K, Kalin-Manttari L, Hemmila H, Smura T, Kinnunen P, Niemimaa J . Metagenomic Evaluation of Bacteria from Voles. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2016; 17(2):123-133. DOI: 10.1089/vbz.2016.1969. View