» Articles » PMID: 38187899

The Quiet Quitting Scale: Development and Initial Validation

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2024 Jan 8
PMID 38187899
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: COVID-19 pandemic causes drastic changes in workplaces that are likely to increase quite quitting among employees. Although quiet quitting is not a new phenomenon, there is no instrument to measure it.

Objective: To develop and validate an instrument assessing quiet quitting among employees.

Methods: We identified and generated items through an extensive literature review and interviews with employees. We carried out the content validity by content experts and we calculated the content validity ratio. We checked face validity by conducting cognitive interviews with employees and calculating the item-level face validity index. We conducted exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis to investigate the quiet quitting scale (QQS) factorial structure. We checked the concurrent validity of the QQS using four other scales, i.e., Copenhagen burnout inventory (CBI), single item burnout (SIB) measure, job satisfaction survey (JSS) and a single item to measure turnover intention. We estimated the reliability of the QQS measuring Cronbach's alpha, McDonald's omega, Cohen's kappa and intraclass correlation coefficient.

Results: After expert panel review and item analysis, nine items with acceptable corrected item-total correlations, inter-item correlations, floor and ceiling effects, skewness and kurtosis were retained. Exploratory factor analysis extracted three factors, namely detachment, lack of initiative and lack of motivation, with a total of nine items. Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed this factorial structure for QQS. We found statistically significant correlations between QQS and CBI, SIB, JSS and turnover intention confirming that the concurrent validity of the QQS was great. Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega of the QQS were 0.803 and 0.806 respectively.

Conclusion: QQS, a three-factor nine-item scale, has robust psychometric properties. QQS is an easy-to-administer, brief, reliable and valid tool to measure employees' quiet quitting. We recommend the use of the QQS in different societies and cultures to assess the validity of the instrument.

Citing Articles

Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Quiet Quitting Scale.

Zhang D, Zheng H, Zeng Y, Yu X, Zhao Y, Gan Y BMC Nurs. 2025; 24(1):270.

PMID: 40069793 PMC: 11900426. DOI: 10.1186/s12912-025-02921-4.


Quiet Quitting in the Hospital Context: Investigating Conflicts, Organizational Support, and Professional Engagement in Greece.

Toska A, Dimitriadou I, Togas C, Nikolopoulou E, Fradelos E, Papathanasiou I Nurs Rep. 2025; 15(2).

PMID: 39997774 PMC: 11858196. DOI: 10.3390/nursrep15020038.


'Quiet quitting' among medical practitioners: a hallmark of burnout, disillusionment and cynicism.

Ng I, Goh W, Thong C, Teo K J R Soc Med. 2025; :1410768241311059.

PMID: 39946171 PMC: 11826815. DOI: 10.1177/01410768241311059.


Poor Nurses' Work Environment Increases Quiet Quitting and Reduces Work Engagement: A Cross-Sectional Study in Greece.

Moisoglou I, Katsiroumpa A, Katsapi A, Konstantakopoulou O, Galanis P Nurs Rep. 2025; 15(1).

PMID: 39852641 PMC: 11767771. DOI: 10.3390/nursrep15010019.


Validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of the quiet quitting scale in healthcare workers.

Yildiz A, Ekingen E, Gun I, Yildirim M BMC Psychol. 2024; 12(1):730.

PMID: 39639345 PMC: 11622596. DOI: 10.1186/s40359-024-02106-9.


References
1.
Williamson K, Lank P, Cheema N, Hartman N, Lovell E . Comparing the Maslach Burnout Inventory to Other Well-Being Instruments in Emergency Medicine Residents. J Grad Med Educ. 2018; 10(5):532-536. PMC: 6194874. DOI: 10.4300/JGME-D-18-00155.1. View

2.
Spector P . Measurement of human service staff satisfaction: development of the Job Satisfaction Survey. Am J Community Psychol. 1985; 13(6):693-713. DOI: 10.1007/BF00929796. View

3.
Kulikowski K . Do we all agree on how to measure work engagement? Factorial validity of Utrecht Work Engagement Scale as a standard measurement tool - A literature review. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2017; 30(2):161-175. DOI: 10.13075/ijomeh.1896.00947. View

4.
Adanaque-Bravo I, Escobar-Segovia K, Gomez-Salgado J, Garcia-Iglesias J, Fagundo-Rivera J, Ruiz-Frutos C . Relationship Between Psychological Distress, Burnout and Work Engagement in Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review. Int J Public Health. 2023; 67:1605605. PMC: 9849247. DOI: 10.3389/ijph.2022.1605605. View

5.
Hodkinson A, Zhou A, Johnson J, Geraghty K, Riley R, Zhou A . Associations of physician burnout with career engagement and quality of patient care: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2022; 378:e070442. PMC: 9472104. DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2022-070442. View