» Articles » PMID: 38187212

Water-blocking Asphyxia of N95 Medical Respirator During Hot Environment Work Tasks With Whole-body Enclosed Anti-bioaerosol Suit

Overview
Journal Saf Health Work
Date 2024 Jan 8
PMID 38187212
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: During hot environment work tasks with whole-body enclosed anti-bioaerosol suit, the combined effect of heavy sweating and exhaled hot humid air may cause the N95 medical respirator to saturate with water/sweat (i.e., water-blocking).

Methods: 32 young male subjects with different body mass indexes (BMI) in whole-body protection (N95 medical respirator + one-piece protective suit + head covering + protective face screen + gloves + shoe covers) were asked to simulate waste collecting from each isolated room in a seven-story building at 27-28°C, and the weight, inhalation resistance (), and aerosol penetration of the respirator before worn and after water-blocking were analyzed.

Results: All subjects reported water-blocking asphyxia of the N95 respirators within 36-67 min of the task. When water-blocking occurred, the and 10-200 nm total aerosol penetration () of the respirators reached up to 1270-1810 Pa and 17.3-23.3%, respectively, which were 10 and 8 times of that before wearing. The most penetration particle size of the respirators increased from 49-65 nm before worn to 115-154 nm under water-blocking condition, and the corresponding maximum size-dependent aerosol penetration increased from 2.5-3.5% to 20-27%. With the increase of BMI, the water-blocking occurrence time firstly increased then reduced, while the , and absorbed water all increased significantly.

Conclusions: This study reveals respirator water-blocking and its serious negative impacts on respiratory protection. When performing moderate-to-high-load tasks with whole-body protection in a hot environment, it is recommended that respirator be replaced with a new one at least every hour to avoid water-blocking asphyxia.

References
1.
Yao W, Li X, Cao W, Li G, Ren L, Gao W . Research on the influence of indoor thermal environment and activity levels on thermal comfort in protective clothing. Energy Build. 2022; 279:112681. PMC: 9676161. DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112681. View

2.
Giacomoni P, Mammone T, Teri M . Gender-linked differences in human skin. J Dermatol Sci. 2009; 55(3):144-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2009.06.001. View

3.
Chopra J, Abiakam N, Kim H, Metcalf C, Worsley P, Cheong Y . The influence of gender and ethnicity on facemasks and respiratory protective equipment fit: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Glob Health. 2021; 6(11). PMC: 8587533. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005537. View

4.
Wong S, Au A, Chen H, Yuen L, Li X, Lung D . Transmission of Omicron (B.1.1.529) - SARS-CoV-2 Variant of Concern in a designated quarantine hotel for travelers: a challenge of elimination strategy of COVID-19. Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2021; 18:100360. PMC: 8696199. DOI: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2021.100360. View

5.
Foster J, Hodder S, Lloyd A, Havenith G . Individual Responses to Heat Stress: Implications for Hyperthermia and Physical Work Capacity. Front Physiol. 2020; 11:541483. PMC: 7516259. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2020.541483. View