» Articles » PMID: 38186905

Tenapanor in Chinese ESRD Patients with Hyperphosphatemia on Haemodialysis: a Randomised, Phase 3 Trial

Overview
Journal Clin Kidney J
Specialty Nephrology
Date 2024 Jan 8
PMID 38186905
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The efficacy and safety of tenapanor has not been confirmed in Chinese end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients with hyperphosphatemia on haemodialysis (HD).

Methods: This was a randomised, double blind, phase 3 trial conducted at 26 dialysis facilities in China (https://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx; CTR20202588). After a 3-week washout, adults with ESRD on HD with hyperphosphatemia were randomised (1:1) using an interactive web response system to oral tenapanor 30 mg twice a day or placebo for 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change in mean serum phosphorous level from baseline to the endpoint visit (day 29 or last serum phosphorus measurement). Efficacy was analysed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of the study drug.

Results: Between 5 March 2021 and 8 June 2022, 77 patients received tenapanor and 73 received placebo. Tenapanor treatment ( = 75) resulted in a significantly greater least squares (LS) mean reduction in serum phosphate at the endpoint visit versus placebo ( = 72): LS mean difference -1.17 mg/dl (95% CI -1.694 to -0.654,  < .001). More patients receiving tenapanor achieved a serum phosphorous level <5.5 mg/dl at the endpoint visit (44.6% versus 10.1%). The most common treatment-related adverse event was diarrhoea [tenapanor 28.6% (22/77), placebo 2.7% (2/73)], which was mostly mild and led to treatment discontinuation in two patients receiving tenapanor.

Conclusions: Tenapanor significantly reduced the serum phosphorous level versus placebo in Chinese ESRD patients on HD and was generally well tolerated.

Citing Articles

Efficacy and safety of tenapanor vs placebo in treating CKD patients on dialysis and with hyperphosphatemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 2251 patients.

Elnaga A, Serag I, Alsaied M, Khalefa B, Rajput J, Ramadan S Int Urol Nephrol. 2024; .

PMID: 39702842 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-024-04316-x.


Efficacy and safety of tenapanor in end-stage renal disease patients with hyperphosphatemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Yu S, Sun J, Guo X Ren Fail. 2024; 46(2):2410389.

PMID: 39351794 PMC: 11445914. DOI: 10.1080/0886022X.2024.2410389.


Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Tenapanor in Healthy Chinese and Caucasian Volunteers: A Randomized, Open-Label, Single-Center, Placebo-Controlled Phase 1 Study.

Yuan G, Chen Y, Li L, Wang X, Wei G, Zeng J Int J Clin Pract. 2024; 2024:1386980.

PMID: 38481823 PMC: 10937073. DOI: 10.1155/2024/1386980.

References
1.
Liyanage T, Ninomiya T, Jha V, Neal B, Patrice H, Okpechi I . Worldwide access to treatment for end-stage kidney disease: a systematic review. Lancet. 2015; 385(9981):1975-82. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61601-9. View

2.
Zheng J, Glezerman I, Sadot E, McNeil A, Zarama C, Gonen M . Hypophosphatemia after Hepatectomy or Pancreatectomy: Role of the Nicotinamide Phosphoribosyltransferase. J Am Coll Surg. 2017; 225(4):488-497.e2. PMC: 5614834. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.06.012. View

3.
Block G, Rosenbaum D, Yan A, Chertow G . Efficacy and Safety of Tenapanor in Patients with Hyperphosphatemia Receiving Maintenance Hemodialysis: A Randomized Phase 3 Trial. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2019; 30(4):641-652. PMC: 6442342. DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2018080832. View

4.
King A, Siegel M, He Y, Nie B, Wang J, Koo-McCoy S . Inhibition of sodium/hydrogen exchanger 3 in the gastrointestinal tract by tenapanor reduces paracellular phosphate permeability. Sci Transl Med. 2018; 10(456). PMC: 6454550. DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aam6474. View

5.
Rastogi A, Bhatt N, Rossetti S, Beto J . Management of Hyperphosphatemia in End-Stage Renal Disease: A New Paradigm. J Ren Nutr. 2020; 31(1):21-34. DOI: 10.1053/j.jrn.2020.02.003. View