» Articles » PMID: 38185921

Mapping Potential Pathways from Polygenic Liability Through Brain Structure to Psychological Problems Across the Transition to Adolescence

Abstract

Background: We used a polygenic score for externalizing behavior (extPGS) and structural MRI to examine potential pathways from genetic liability to conduct problems via the brain across the adolescent transition.

Methods: Three annual assessments of child conduct problems, attention-deficit/hyperactivity problems, and internalizing problems were conducted across across 9-13 years of age among 4,475 children of European ancestry in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study (ABCD Study®).

Results: The extPGS predicted conduct problems in each wave (R = 2.0%-2.9%). Bifactor models revealed that the extPRS predicted variance specific to conduct problems (R = 1.7%-2.1%), but also variance that conduct problems shared with other measured problems (R = .8%-1.4%). Longitudinally, extPGS predicted levels of specific conduct problems (R = 2.0%), but not their slope of change across age. The extPGS was associated with total gray matter volume (TGMV; R = .4%) and lower TGMV predicted both specific conduct problems (R = 1.7%-2.1%) and the variance common to all problems in each wave (R = 1.6%-3.1%). A modest proportion of the polygenic liability specific to conduct problems in each wave was statistically mediated by TGMV.

Conclusions: Across the adolescent transition, the extPGS predicted both variance specific to conduct problems and variance shared by all measured problems. The extPGS also was associated with TGMV, which robustly predicted conduct problems. Statistical mediation analyses suggested the hypothesis that polygenic variation influences individual differences in brain development that are related to the likelihood of conduct problems during the adolescent transition, justifying new research to test this causal hypothesis.

Citing Articles

Longitudinal Sex-at-Birth and Age Analyses of Cortical Structure in the ABCD Study.

Marshall A, Adise S, Kan E, Sowell E J Neurosci. 2025; 45(10).

PMID: 39843235 PMC: 11884399. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1091-24.2025.

References
1.
Patel Y, Parker N, Salum G, Pausova Z, Paus T . General Psychopathology, Cognition, and the Cerebral Cortex in 10-Year-Old Children: Insights From the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study. Front Hum Neurosci. 2022; 15:781554. PMC: 8823367. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.781554. View

2.
Lahey B, Van Hulle C, Singh A, Waldman I, Rathouz P . Higher-order genetic and environmental structure of prevalent forms of child and adolescent psychopathology. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2011; 68(2):181-9. PMC: 3322461. DOI: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.192. View

3.
Forbes M, Sunderland M, Rapee R, Batterham P, Calear A, Carragher N . A detailed hierarchical model of psychopathology: From individual symptoms up to the general factor of psychopathology. Clin Psychol Sci. 2021; 9(2):139-168. PMC: 7983870. DOI: 10.1177/2167702620954799. View

4.
Cosgrove V, Rhee S, Gelhorn H, Boeldt D, Corley R, Ehringer M . Structure and etiology of co-occurring internalizing and externalizing disorders in adolescents. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2010; 39(1):109-23. PMC: 3036783. DOI: 10.1007/s10802-010-9444-8. View

5.
Hicks B, Krueger R, Iacono W, McGue M, Patrick C . Family transmission and heritability of externalizing disorders: a twin-family study. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2004; 61(9):922-8. DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.61.9.922. View