» Articles » PMID: 38184642

In-person Cognitive Behavioural Therapy Vs. Usual Care After Surgical Management of Extremity Fractures: an Unsuccessful Feasibility Trial

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2024 Jan 6
PMID 38184642
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Extremity fractures are common, and most are managed operatively; however, despite successful reduction, up to half of patients report persistent post-surgical pain. Furthermore, psychological factors such as stress, distress, anxiety, depression, catastrophizing, and fear-avoidance behaviors have been associated with the development of chronic pain. The purpose of this pilot study was to examine the feasibility of a randomized controlled trial to determine the effect of in-person cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) vs. usual care on persistent post-surgical pain among patients with a surgically managed extremity fracture.

Methods: Eligible patients were randomized to either in-person CBT or usual care. We used four criteria to judge the composite measure of feasibility: 1) successful implementation of CBT at each clinical site, 2) 40 patients recruited within 6 months, 3) treatment compliance in a minimum 36 of 40 participants (90%), and 4) 32 of 40 participants (80%) achieving follow-up at one year. The primary clinical outcome was persistent post-surgical pain at one year after surgery.

Results: Only two of the four participating sites were able to implement the CBT regimen due to difficulties with identifying certified therapists who had the capacity to accommodate additional patients into their schedule within the required timeframe (i.e., 8 weeks of their fracture). Given the challenges associated with CBT implementation, only one site was able to actively recruit patients. This site screened 86 patients and enrolled 3 patients (3.5%) over a period of three months. Participants were unable to comply with the in-person CBT, with no participants attending an in-person CBT session. Follow-up at one year could not be assessed as the pilot study was stopped early, three months into the study, due to failure to achieve the other three feasibility criteria.

Conclusion: Our pilot trial failed to demonstrate the feasibility of a trial of in-person CBT versus usual care to prevent persistent pain after surgical repair of traumatic long-bone fractures and re-enforces the importance of establishing feasibility before embarking on definitive trials. Protocol modifications to address the identified barriers include the delivery of our intervention as a therapist-guided, remote CBT program.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier NCT03196258); Registered June 22, 2017, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03196258.

Citing Articles

Upskilling pain relief after surgery: a scoping review of perioperative behavioral intervention efficacy and practical considerations for implementation.

Darnall B, Abshire L, Courtney R, Davin S Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2025; 50(2):93-101.

PMID: 39909552 PMC: 11877026. DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2024-105601.


Reasons for declining to participate in a trial of online cognitive behavioural therapy following orthopaedic trauma: A mixed methods study.

Sprague S, Gallant J, Fleming N, Bzovsky S, MacRae S, Lyons M PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0317485.

PMID: 39820627 PMC: 11737714. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317485.


Cognitive Behavioural Therapy to Optimize Post-Operative Recovery (COPE): a randomized controlled feasibility trial in extremity fracture patients.

Gouveia K, Sprague S, Gallant J, MacRae S, Del Fabbro G, Bzovsky S Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2025; 11(1):3.

PMID: 39799376 PMC: 11724510. DOI: 10.1186/s40814-024-01592-3.

References
1.
Perkins F, Kehlet H . Chronic pain as an outcome of surgery. A review of predictive factors. Anesthesiology. 2000; 93(4):1123-33. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200010000-00038. View

2.
Ebrahim S, Malachowski C, Kamal El Din M, Mulla S, Montoya L, Bance S . Measures of patients' expectations about recovery: a systematic review. J Occup Rehabil. 2014; 25(1):240-55. DOI: 10.1007/s10926-014-9535-4. View

3.
Breivik H, Collett B, Ventafridda V, Cohen R, Gallacher D . Survey of chronic pain in Europe: prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment. Eur J Pain. 2005; 10(4):287-333. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.06.009. View

4.
Wosik J, Fudim M, Cameron B, Gellad Z, Cho A, Phinney D . Telehealth transformation: COVID-19 and the rise of virtual care. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020; 27(6):957-962. PMC: 7188147. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa067. View

5.
Johannes C, Le T, Zhou X, Johnston J, Dworkin R . The prevalence of chronic pain in United States adults: results of an Internet-based survey. J Pain. 2010; 11(11):1230-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2010.07.002. View