» Articles » PMID: 38184588

Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator and Cardiac Resynchronization Treatment in People with Type 2 Diabetes: a Comparison with Age- and Sex Matched Controls from the General Population

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Increased risk of severe tachyarrhythmias is reported in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The aim of this study was to explore if treatment with cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) such as implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), cardiac resynchronization therapy- pacemaker and -defibrillator (CRT-P/CRT-D) differed in patients with vs. without T2DM. A secondary aim was to identify patient characteristics indicating an increased CIED treatment.

Method: 416 162 adult patients with T2DM from the Swedish National Diabetes Registry and 2 081 087 controls from the Swedish population, matched for age, sex and living area, were included between 1/1/1998 and 31/12/2012 and followed until 31/12/2013. They were compared regarding prevalence of ventricular tachycardia (VT) at baseline and the risk of receiving a CIED during follow-up. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed to estimate the risk of CIED-treatment and factors identifying patients with such risk.

Results: Ventricular fibrillation (VF) (0.1% vs 0.0004%) and (VT) (0.2% vs. 0.1%) were more frequent among patients with T2DM compared to controls. CIED-treatment was significantly increased in patients with T2DM both in unadjusted and adjusted analyses. HR and 95% CI, after adjustment for sex, age, marital status, income, education, country of birth, coronary artery disease and congestive heart failure, were 1.32 [1.21-1.45] for ICD, 1.74 [1.55-1.95] for CRT-P and 1.69 [1.43-1.99] for CRT-D. Blood-pressure and lipid lowering therapies were independent risk factors associated to receiving CIED, while female sex was protective.

Conclusions: Although the proportion of VT/VF was low, patients with T2DM had a higher prevalence of these conditions and increased risk for treatment with CIED compared to controls. This underlines the importance of recognizing that T2DM patients have an increased need of CIED.

References
1.
Johansson I, Dahlstrom U, Edner M, Nasman P, Ryden L, Norhammar A . Type 2 diabetes and heart failure: Characteristics and prognosis in preserved, mid-range and reduced ventricular function. Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2018; 15(6):494-503. DOI: 10.1177/1479164118794619. View

2.
Gregoratos G, Abrams J, Epstein A, Freedman R, Hayes D, Hlatky M . ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 guideline update for implantation of cardiac pacemakers and antiarrhythmia devices: summary article. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/NASPE.... J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2002; 13(11):1183-99. DOI: 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2002.01183.x. View

3.
Rawshani A, Rawshani A, Gudbjornsdottir S . Mortality and Cardiovascular Disease in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2017; 377(3):300-301. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc1706292. View

4.
Zinman B, Wanner C, Lachin J, Fitchett D, Bluhmki E, Hantel S . Empagliflozin, Cardiovascular Outcomes, and Mortality in Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2015; 373(22):2117-28. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1504720. View

5.
Curtis L, Al-Khatib S, Shea A, Hammill B, Hernandez A, Schulman K . Sex differences in the use of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators for primary and secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death. JAMA. 2007; 298(13):1517-24. DOI: 10.1001/jama.298.13.1517. View