» Articles » PMID: 38184369

Non-ischemic Cerebral Enhancing (NICE) Lesions After Flow Diversion for Intracranial Aneurysms: a Multicenter Study

Abstract

Background: Non-ischemic cerebral enhancing (NICE) lesions have been reported as a rare complication of various neuroendovascular procedures, but information on their incidence after flow diversion is scant. It is unclear if specific devices or novel coating technologies may impact their occurrence.

Methods: We conducted a multicenter study on the incidence of NICE lesions after flow diverter (FD) implantation for cerebral aneurysm treatment.

Results: Eight centers identified 15 patients and provided detailed data. The clinical presentation ranged from asymptomatic to hemiplegia and cognitive impairment. The mean time to diagnosis after treatment was 65.1±101.5 days. Five centers disclosed information on all of their 1201 FD procedures during the inclusion period (2015-2022), during which 12 patients were diagnosed with NICE lesions in these institutions-that is, an incidence of 1%. FD coatings did not increase the incidence (6/591 patients (1%) treated with surface-modified FD vs 6/610 patients (1%) treated with bare FD; P=1.00). Significantly increased rates of 3.7% (6 cases in 161 procedures; P<0.01) and 3.3% (5 cases in 153 procedures; P<0.01) were found with stents of two specific product lines. The use of one product line was associated with a significantly lower incidence (0 cases in 499 procedures (0%); P<0.01).

Conclusions: Novel stent coatings are not associated with an increased incidence of NICE lesions. The incidence rate of 1% suggests that these lesions may occur more often after flow diversion than after other endovascular treatments. We found a concerning accumulation of NICE lesion cases when FDs from two product families were used.

Citing Articles

Hydrophilic polymer coating delamination during neurointerventional treatment after microcatheter withdrawal: particulate identification through attenuated total reflection Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy.

Muller S, Albina-Palmarola P, Konieczny S, Manke G, Fischer S, Henkes H Front Neurol. 2025; 15:1479375.

PMID: 39882360 PMC: 11774725. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1479375.

References
1.
Shotar E, Labeyrie M, Biondi A, Velasco S, Saliou G, Boulouis G . Non-ischemic cerebral enhancing lesions after intracranial aneurysm endovascular repair: a retrospective French national registry. J Neurointerv Surg. 2021; 14(9):925-930. DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-017992. View

2.
Becske T, Brinjikji W, Potts M, Kallmes D, Shapiro M, Moran C . Long-Term Clinical and Angiographic Outcomes Following Pipeline Embolization Device Treatment of Complex Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysms: Five-Year Results of the Pipeline for Uncoilable or Failed Aneurysms Trial. Neurosurgery. 2017; 80(1):40-48. DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyw014. View

3.
Bakola E, Katsanos A, Palaiodimou L, Theodorou A, Stefanou M, Chondrogianni M . Delayed recurrent enhancing white matter lesions complicating coiling of intracranial aneurysm. Eur J Neurol. 2021; 28(7):2388-2391. DOI: 10.1111/ene.14844. View

4.
Hagen M, Girdhar G, Wainwright J, Hinds M . Thrombogenicity of flow diverters in an ex vivo shunt model: effect of phosphorylcholine surface modification. J Neurointerv Surg. 2016; 9(10):1006-1011. PMC: 5629931. DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012612. View

5.
Shapiro M, Ollenschleger M, Baccin C, Becske T, Spiegel G, Wang Y . Foreign Body Emboli following Cerebrovascular Interventions: Clinical, Radiographic, and Histopathologic Features. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015; 36(11):2121-6. PMC: 7964857. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4415. View