What Works, How and in Which Contexts when Supporting Parents to Implement Intensive Speech and Language Therapy at Home for Children with Speech Sound Disorder? A Protocol for a Realist Review

Overview

Journal BMJ Open

Specialty General Medicine

Date 2024 Jan 6

PMID 38184311

Authors

Naomi Leafe

Emma Pagnamenta

Laurence Taggart

Mark Donnelly

Angela Hassiotis

Jill Titterington

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: Speech and language therapists (SLTs) worldwide report challenges with providing recommended, evidence-based intervention intensity for children with speech sound disorder (SSD). Challenges such as service constraints and/or family contexts impact on access to optimal therapy intensity. Existing research indicates that empowering and training parents to deliver intervention at home, alongside SLT support, offers one possible solution to increasing the intensity of intervention children with SSD receive. Digital health could increase accessibility to intensive home practice and help sustain engagement with therapy activities. Further exploration is needed around what makes parent-implemented interventions for children with SSD effective, for who and in which situations. This paper outlines the protocol for a realist review which aims to explore the active ingredients and contextual factors of effective digital parent-led interventions.

Methods And Analysis: A realist review will explore the research question, following six stages. The scope of the review will be determined, and initial programme theories will be developed about what works in digital parent-implemented interventions for SSD, for whom, how, why and in what circumstances. Relevant secondary data, identified through a formal search strategy, will be selected, appraised, analysed and synthesised using realist principles to test and further refine the initial programme theories. This process will develop refined underpinning explanatory theories which capture the interaction between contexts, mechanisms and outcomes of the intervention. An expert steering group will provide insight to inform explanatory theories, searches, and dissemination.

Ethics And Dissemination: Ethical approval is not required for this review. The refined programme theories from the review will inform the next stages of a wider study. A subsequent realist evaluation will test and further refine theories with key stakeholders. Following this, the underpinning programme theory will be used to coproduce a digital tool, to support parents to deliver home intervention alongside SLT support.

References

Eadie P, Morgan A, Ukoumunne O, Ttofari Eecen K, Wake M, Reilly S . Speech sound disorder at 4 years: prevalence, comorbidities, and predictors in a community cohort of children. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2014; 57(6):578-84. DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.12635. View

Hegarty N, Titterington J, Taggart L . A qualitative exploration of speech-language pathologists' intervention and intensity provision for children with phonological impairment. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2020; 23(2):213-224. DOI: 10.1080/17549507.2020.1769728. View

Hegarty N, Titterington J, McLeod S, Taggart L . Intervention for children with phonological impairment: Knowledge, practices and intervention intensity in the UK. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2018; 53(5):995-1006. DOI: 10.1111/1460-6984.12416. View

Joffe V, Pring T . Children with phonological problems: a survey of clinical practice. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2008; 43(2):154-64. DOI: 10.1080/13682820701660259. View

Sugden E, Baker E, Williams A, Munro N, Trivette C . Evaluation of Parent- and Speech-Language Pathologist-Delivered Multiple Oppositions Intervention for Children With Phonological Impairment: A Multiple-Baseline Design Study. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019; 29(1):111-126. DOI: 10.1044/2019_AJSLP-18-0248. View

McGill N, McLeod S . Aspirations for a website to support families' active waiting for speech-language pathology. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019; 21(3):263-274. DOI: 10.1080/17549507.2019.1604802. View

McCormack J, Baker E, Masso S, Crowe K, McLeod S, Wren Y . Implementation fidelity of a computer-assisted intervention for children with speech sound disorders. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2017; 19(3):265-276. DOI: 10.1080/17549507.2017.1293160. View

Law J, Boyle J, Harris F, Harkness A, Nye C . Prevalence and natural history of primary speech and language delay: findings from a systematic review of the literature. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2000; 35(2):165-88. DOI: 10.1080/136828200247133. View

Yasmin T, Hafeez H, Sadia A, Lubna M, Tarar S, Raza M . Working memory span and receptive vocabulary assessment in Urdu speaking children with speech sound disorder. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2022; 231:103777. PMC: 11318477. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103777. View

10.

Cane J, OConnor D, Michie S . Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research. Implement Sci. 2012; 7:37. PMC: 3483008. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-37. View

11.

Jessup B, Ward E, Cahill L, Keating D . Prevalence of speech and/or language impairment in preparatory students in northern Tasmania. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2010; 10(5):364-77. DOI: 10.1080/17549500701871171. View

12.

Mathews S, McShea M, Hanley C, Ravitz A, Labrique A, Cohen A . Digital health: a path to validation. NPJ Digit Med. 2019; 2:38. PMC: 6550273. DOI: 10.1038/s41746-019-0111-3. View

13.

Broomfield J, Dodd B . Children with speech and language disability: caseload characteristics. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2004; 39(3):303-24. DOI: 10.1080/13682820310001625589. View

14.

Williams A . Intensity in phonological intervention: is there a prescribed amount?. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2012; 14(5):456-61. DOI: 10.3109/17549507.2012.688866. View

15.

Jagosh J, Pluye P, Macaulay A, Salsberg J, Henderson J, Sirett E . Assessing the outcomes of participatory research: protocol for identifying, selecting, appraising and synthesizing the literature for realist review. Implement Sci. 2011; 6:24. PMC: 3072934. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-24. View

16.

Law J, Dornstauder M, Charlton J, Greaux M . Tele-practice for children and young people with communication disabilities: Employing the COM-B model to review the intervention literature and inform guidance for practitioners. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2021; 56(2):415-434. DOI: 10.1111/1460-6984.12592. View

17.

Baker E . Optimal intervention intensity. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2012; 14(5):401-9. DOI: 10.3109/17549507.2012.700323. View

18.

McLeod S, Baker E . Speech-language pathologists' practices regarding assessment, analysis, target selection, intervention, and service delivery for children with speech sound disorders. Clin Linguist Phon. 2014; 28(7-8):508-31. DOI: 10.3109/02699206.2014.926994. View

19.

Page M, McKenzie J, Bossuyt P, Boutron I, Hoffmann T, Mulrow C . The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2021; 10(1):89. PMC: 8008539. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4. View

20.

Wren Y, Pagnamenta E, Orchard F, Peters T, Emond A, Northstone K . Social, emotional and behavioural difficulties associated with persistent speech disorder in children: A prospective population study. JCPP Adv. 2023; 3(1):e12126. PMC: 10241475. DOI: 10.1002/jcv2.12126. View