» Articles » PMID: 38183711

Genomic Profiling in GIST: Implications in Clinical Outcome and Future Challenges

Abstract

Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST) are the most frequent mesenchymal neoplasia of the digestive tract. Genomic alterations in KIT, PDFGRA, SDH, and BRAF genes are essential in GIST oncogenesis. Therefore, the mutations in these genes have demonstrated clinical implications. Tumors with deletions in KIT-exon 11 or duplications in exon 9 are associated with a worse prognosis. In contrast, KIT-exon 11 substitutions and duplications are associated with a better clinical outcome. Moreover, mutations in Kit exon 9 and 11 are actionable, due to their response to imatinib, while mutations in PDGFRA respond to sunitinib and/or avapritinib. Although, molecular testing on tissue samples is effective; it is invasive, requires adequate amounts of tissue, and a long experimental process is needed for results. In contrast, liquid biopsy has been proposed as a simple and non-invasive method to test biomarkers in cancer. The most common molecule analyzed by liquid biopsy is circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). GISTs ctDNA testing has been demonstrated to be effective in identifying known and novel KIT mutations that were not detected using traditional tissue DNA testing and have been useful in determining progression risk and response to TKI therapy. This allows the clinician to have an accurate picture of the genetic changes of the tumor over time. In this work, we aimed to discuss the implications of mutational testing in clinical outcomes, the methods to test ctDNA and the future challenges in the establishment of alternatives of personalized medicine.

Citing Articles

Exploring nanotechnology solutions for improved outcomes in gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Gabellone S, Vanni S, Fausti V, Miserocchi G, Liverani C, Spadazzi C Heliyon. 2024; 10(23):e40596.

PMID: 39687122 PMC: 11647801. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40596.


circ_SMA4 promotes gastrointestinal stromal tumors malignant progression by sponging miR-494-3p/KIT axis and activating JAK/STAT pathway.

Zou F, Tang Y, Li X, Liu C, Wu C, Zhang L Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):22004.

PMID: 39317735 PMC: 11422497. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-73393-w.


Gene Mutations in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: Advances in Treatment and Mechanism Research.

Cao L, Tian W, Zhao Y, Song P, Zhao J, Wang C Glob Med Genet. 2024; 11(4):251-262.

PMID: 39176108 PMC: 11341198. DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1789204.

References
1.
Arshad J, Ahmed J, Subhawong T, Trent J . Progress in determining response to treatment in gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2020; 20(4):279-288. PMC: 9479164. DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2020.1745068. View

2.
Gomez-Peregrina D, Garcia-Valverde A, Pilco-Janeta D, Serrano C . Liquid Biopsy in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: Ready for Prime Time?. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2021; 22(4):32. DOI: 10.1007/s11864-021-00832-5. View

3.
Mei L, Smith S, Faber A, Trent J, Grossman S, Stratakis C . Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: The GIST of Precision Medicine. Trends Cancer. 2018; 4(1):74-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.trecan.2017.11.006. View

4.
Choi J, Ro J . The Recent Advances in Molecular Diagnosis of Soft Tissue Tumors. Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(6). PMC: 10051446. DOI: 10.3390/ijms24065934. View

5.
Zhang Y, Renberg S, Papakonstantinou A, de Flon F . Diagnosing gastrointestinal stromal tumors: The utility of fine-needle aspiration cytology versus biopsy. Cancer Med. 2022; 11(14):2729-2734. PMC: 9302265. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4630. View