» Articles » PMID: 38180799

Acceptance and User Experiences of a Wearable Device for the Management of Hospitalized Patients in COVID-19-Designated Wards in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam: Action Learning Project

Abstract

Background: Wearable devices have been used extensively both inside and outside of the hospital setting. During the COVID-19 pandemic, in some contexts, there was an increased need to remotely monitor pulse and saturated oxygen for patients due to the lack of staff and bedside monitors.

Objective: A prototype of a remote monitoring system using wearable pulse oximeter devices was implemented at the Hospital for Tropical Diseases in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, from August to December 2021. The aim of this work was to support the ongoing implementation of the remote monitoring system.

Methods: We used an action learning approach with rapid pragmatic methods, including informal discussions and observations as well as a feedback survey form designed based on the technology acceptance model to assess the use and acceptability of the system. Based on these results, we facilitated a meeting using user-centered design principles to explore user needs and ideas about its development in more detail.

Results: In total, 21 users filled in the feedback form. The mean technology acceptance model scores ranged from 3.5 (for perceived ease of use) to 4.4 (for attitude) with behavioral intention (3.8) and perceived usefulness (4.2) scoring in between. Those working as nurses scored higher on perceived usefulness, attitude, and behavioral intention than did physicians. Based on informal discussions, we realized there was a mismatch between how we (ie, the research team) and the ward teams perceived the use and wider purpose of the technology.

Conclusions: Designing and implementing the devices to be more nurse-centric from their introduction could have helped to increase their efficiency and use during the complex pandemic period.

References
1.
Seshadri D, Davies E, Harlow E, Hsu J, Knighton S, Walker T . Wearable Sensors for COVID-19: A Call to Action to Harness Our Digital Infrastructure for Remote Patient Monitoring and Virtual Assessments. Front Digit Health. 2021; 2:8. PMC: 8521919. DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2020.00008. View

2.
Thai P, Rabaa M, Luong D, Tan D, Quang T, Quach H . The First 100 Days of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Control in Vietnam. Clin Infect Dis. 2020; 72(9):e334-e342. PMC: 7454342. DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1130. View

3.
Iqbal F, Joshi M, Davies G, Khan S, Ashrafian H, Darzi A . Design of the pilot, proof of concept REMOTE-COVID trial: remote monitoring use in suspected cases of COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2). Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2021; 7(1):62. PMC: 7933391. DOI: 10.1186/s40814-021-00804-4. View

4.
Mitgang E, Blaya J, Chopra M . Digital Health in Response to COVID-19 in Low- and Middle-income Countries: Opportunities and Challenges. Glob Policy. 2021; 12(Suppl 6):107-109. PMC: 8250781. DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.12880. View

5.
Morcillo L, Morer-Camo P, Rodriguez Ferradas M, Cazon Martin A . The Wearable Co-Design Domino: A User-Centered Methodology to Co-Design and Co-Evaluate Wearables. Sensors (Basel). 2020; 20(10). PMC: 7287997. DOI: 10.3390/s20102934. View