A Novel Approach of Kinship Determination Based on the Physical Length of Genetically Shared Regions of Chromosomes

Overview

Journal Genes Genomics

Specialty Genetics

Date 2024 Jan 5

PMID 38180716

Authors

Sohee Cho

Eunsoon Shin

Yoon Gi Park

Seung Ho Choi

Eun Kyung Choe

Jung Ho Bae

Jong-Eun Lee

Soong Deok Lee

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Determination of genetic relatedness between individuals plays a crucial role in resolving numerous civil cases involving familial relationships and in forensic investigation concerning missing persons. Short tandem repeats (STRs), known for their high degree of DNA polymorphism, have traditionally been the primary choice of DNA markers in genetic testing, but their application for kinships testing is limited to cases involving close kinship. SNPs have emerged as promising supplementary markers for kinship determination. Nevertheless, the challenging remains in discriminating between third-degree or more distant relatives, such as first cousins, using SNPs.

Objective: To investigate a kinship analysis method for distant degree of familial relationships using high-density SNP data.

Methods: A high-density SNP data from 337 individuals of Korean families using Affymetrix Axiom KORV1.0-96 Array was obtained for this study. SNPs were aligned by chromosomal positions, and identity-by-state (IBS) was determined, and then shared regions as consecutive SNPs with IBS of 1 or 2 were investigated. The physical lengths of these IBS segments were measured and summed them to create an Index, as a measure of kinship.

Results: The kinship was determined by the physical length of shared chromosomal regions that are distinguished by each kinship. Using this method, the relationship was able be distinguished up to the fourth degree of kinship, and non-relatives were clearly distinguished from true relatives. We also found a potential for this approach to be used universally, regardless of microarray platforms for SNP genotyping and populations.

Conclusion: This method has a potential to determine the different degree of kinship between individuals and to distinguish non-relatives from true relatives, which can be of great help for practical applications in kinship determination.

Citing Articles

Validation of the Utility of the Genetically Shared Regions of Chromosomes (GD-ICS) Measuring Method in Identifying Complicated Genetic Relatedness.

Cho S, Shin E, Park Y, You H, Lee E, Lee J J Korean Med Sci. 2024; 39(27):e198.

PMID: 39015000 PMC: 11249576. DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e198.

References

Li R, Li H, Peng D, Hao B, Wang Z, Huang E . Improved pairwise kinship analysis using massively parallel sequencing. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2018; 38:77-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.10.006. View

Nievergelt C, Smith D, Kohlenberg J, Schork N . Large-scale integration of human genetic and physical maps. Genome Res. 2004; 14(6):1199-205. PMC: 419799. DOI: 10.1101/gr.1475304. View

Livy A, Lye S, Jagdish C, Hanis N, Sharmila V, Ler L . Evaluation of quality of DNA extracted from buccal swabs for microarray based genotyping. Indian J Clin Biochem. 2013; 27(1):28-33. PMC: 3286590. DOI: 10.1007/s12291-011-0154-y. View

Samson C, Whitford W, Snell R, Jacobsen J, Lehnert K . Contaminating DNA in human saliva alters the detection of variants from whole genome sequencing. Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):19255. PMC: 7648094. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-76022-4. View

Daw E, Thompson E, Wijsman E . Bias in multipoint linkage analysis arising from map misspecification. Genet Epidemiol. 2000; 19(4):366-80. DOI: 10.1002/1098-2272(200012)19:4<366::AID-GEPI8>3.0.CO;2-F. View

Skare O, Sheehan N, Egeland T . Identification of distant family relationships. Bioinformatics. 2009; 25(18):2376-82. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp418. View

Hackett C, Broadfoot L . Effects of genotyping errors, missing values and segregation distortion in molecular marker data on the construction of linkage maps. Heredity (Edinb). 2003; 90(1):33-8. DOI: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800173. View

Kling D, Welander J, Tillmar A, Skare O, Egeland T, Holmlund G . DNA microarray as a tool in establishing genetic relatedness--Current status and future prospects. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2011; 6(3):322-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2011.07.007. View

Wen D, Xing H, Liu Y, Li J, Qu W, He W . The application of short and highly polymorphic microhaplotype loci in paternity testing and sibling testing of temperature-dependent degraded samples. Front Genet. 2022; 13:983811. PMC: 9549137. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.983811. View

10.

Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, Thomas L, Ferreira M, Bender D . PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am J Hum Genet. 2007; 81(3):559-75. PMC: 1950838. DOI: 10.1086/519795. View

11.

LaFramboise T . Single nucleotide polymorphism arrays: a decade of biological, computational and technological advances. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009; 37(13):4181-93. PMC: 2715261. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkp552. View

12.

Moon S, Kim Y, Han S, Hwang M, Shin D, Park M . The Korea Biobank Array: Design and Identification of Coding Variants Associated with Blood Biochemical Traits. Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):1382. PMC: 6361960. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-37832-9. View

13.

Bertoglio B, Grignani P, Di Simone P, Polizzi N, De Angelis D, Cattaneo C . Disaster victim identification by kinship analysis: the Lampedusa October 3rd, 2013 shipwreck. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2019; 44:102156. DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2019.102156. View

14.

Delaneau O, Coulonges C, Zagury J . Shape-IT: new rapid and accurate algorithm for haplotype inference. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008; 9:540. PMC: 2647951. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-540. View

15.

von Wurmb-Schwark N, Podruks E, Schwark T, Gopel W, Fimmers R, Poetsch M . About the power of biostatistics in sibling analysis-comparison of empirical and simulated data. Int J Legal Med. 2015; 129(6):1201-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00414-015-1252-9. View

16.

Balding D, Nichols R . A method for quantifying differentiation between populations at multi-allelic loci and its implications for investigating identity and paternity. Genetica. 1995; 96(1-2):3-12. DOI: 10.1007/BF01441146. View

17.

Morimoto C, Manabe S, Fujimoto S, Hamano Y, Tamaki K . Discrimination of relationships with the same degree of kinship using chromosomal sharing patterns estimated from high-density SNPs. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2017; 33:10-16. DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2017.11.010. View

18.

Myers S, Bottolo L, Freeman C, McVean G, Donnelly P . A fine-scale map of recombination rates and hotspots across the human genome. Science. 2005; 310(5746):321-4. DOI: 10.1126/science.1117196. View

19.

Mo S, Ren Z, Yang Y, Liu Y, Zhang J, Wu H . A 472-SNP panel for pairwise kinship testing of second-degree relatives. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2018; 34:178-185. DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.02.019. View

20.

Kling D, Tillmar A . Forensic genealogy-A comparison of methods to infer distant relationships based on dense SNP data. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2019; 42:113-124. DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2019.06.019. View