» Articles » PMID: 38180139

Natural Language Processing to Extract SNOMED-CT Codes from Pathological Reports

Abstract

Objective: The use of standardized structured reports (SSR) and suitable terminologies like SNOMED-CT can enhance data retrieval and analysis, fostering large-scale studies and collaboration. However, the still large prevalence of narrative reports in our laboratories warrants alternative and automated labeling approaches. In this project, natural language processing (NLP) methods were used to associate SNOMED-CT codes to structured and unstructured reports from an Italian Digital Pathology Department.

Methods: Two NLP-based automatic coding systems (support vector machine, SVM, and long-short term memory, LSTM) were trained and applied to a series of narrative reports.

Results: The 1163 cases were tested with both algorithms, showing good performances in terms of accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score, with SVM showing slightly better performances as compared to LSTM (0.84, 0.87, 0.83, 0.82 vs 0.83, 0.85, 0.83, 0.82, respectively). The integration of an explainability allowed identification of terms and groups of words of importance, enabling fine-tuning, balancing semantic meaning and model performance.

Conclusions: AI tools allow the automatic SNOMED-CT labeling of the pathology archives, providing a retrospective fix to the large lack of organization of narrative reports.

References
1.
LImperio V, Gibilisco F, Fraggetta F . What is Essential is (No More) Invisible to the Eyes: The Introduction of BlocDoc in the Digital Pathology Workflow. J Pathol Inform. 2021; 12:32. PMC: 8529340. DOI: 10.4103/jpi.jpi_35_21. View

2.
Eccher A, Dei Tos A, Scarpa A, LImperio V, Munari E, Troncone G . Cost analysis of archives in the pathology laboratories: from safety to management. J Clin Pathol. 2023; 76(10):659-663. PMC: 10511949. DOI: 10.1136/jcp-2023-209035. View

3.
Renshaw A, Mena-Allauca M, Gould E, Sirintrapun S . Synoptic Reporting: Evidence-Based Review and Future Directions. JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2019; 2:1-9. PMC: 6873952. DOI: 10.1200/CCI.17.00088. View

4.
Deeken-Draisey A, Ritchie A, Yang G, Quinn M, Ernst L, Guttormsen A . Current Procedural Terminology Coding for Surgical Pathology: A Review and One Academic Center's Experience With Pathologist-Verified Coding. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2018; 142(12):1524-1532. DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2017-0190-RA. View

5.
Amin M, Dhir R . Data Representation, Coding, and Communication Standards. Surg Pathol Clin. 2015; 8(2):109-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.path.2015.02.001. View