» Articles » PMID: 38172458

Alveolar Ridge Splitting and Simvastatin Loaded Xenograft for Guided Bone Regeneration and Simultaneous Implant Placement: Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Overview
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2024 Jan 3
PMID 38172458
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: The present study goal was to assess clinically and radiographically using simvastatin (SMV) loaded xenograft for guided bone regeneration (GBR) around simultaneously placed implants with alveolar ridge splitting in patients with horizontally atrophic jaw defect.

Materials And Methods: Randomized distribution of the twenty-two patients into two groups (11 patients each) was performed. Group I participants received alveolar ride splitting (ARS) with GBR using SMV gel mixed bone graft and a barrier membrane with simultaneous implant placement. Group II received the same treatment protocol without SMV gel. At the baseline, 6- and 9-months post-surgery, clinical and radiological alterations were assessed.

Results: Six months after therapy, PES records of group I were statistically significantly improved than those of group II (P < .001). Group I exhibited statistically significant expansion of the alveolar ridge over group II after 6 and 9 months (P < .001). When compared to group II over the evaluation interval between 6 and 9 months, group I demonstrated statistically substantially minimal loss of the mean marginal bone level (P < .001). At the 6- and 9-month observation periods, bone density gain was considerably higher in group I than that in group II (P < .001).

Conclusion: Alveolar ridge splitting along with GBR-augmented SMV improve the clinical and radiographical outcomes around dental implant over GBR alone.

Clinical Relevance: Augmenting GBR with SMV in alveolar ridge splitting could boost implant osseointegration and enhance peri-implant tissue changes.

Clinical Trial Registration: NCT05020405.

Citing Articles

Finite element analysis of a new alveolar bone splitting technique in the mandibular posterior region.

Tian Y, Shi X, Zhai S, Liu Y, Yang Z, Wu Y BMC Oral Health. 2025; 25(1):359.

PMID: 40057716 PMC: 11890722. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-025-05559-5.


Microarchitectural Study of the Augmented Bone Following a Modified Ridge Splitting Technique: Histological and Micro-Computed Tomography Analyses.

Penzes D, Szerencse C, Major M, Szabo G, Kontsek E, Baskay J J Clin Med. 2024; 13(22).

PMID: 39597823 PMC: 11594336. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13226679.

References
1.
Sculean A, Nikolidakis D, Schwarz F . Regeneration of periodontal tissues: combinations of barrier membranes and grafting materials - biological foundation and preclinical evidence: a systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2008; 35(8 Suppl):106-16. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01263.x. View

2.
Santana R, de Mattos C, Van Dyke T . Efficacy of combined regenerative treatments in human mandibular class II furcation defects. J Periodontol. 2009; 80(11):1756-64. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2009.080605. View

3.
Sculean A, Nikolidakis D, Nikou G, Ivanovic A, Chapple I, Stavropoulos A . Biomaterials for promoting periodontal regeneration in human intrabony defects: a systematic review. Periodontol 2000. 2015; 68(1):182-216. DOI: 10.1111/prd.12086. View

4.
Esposito M, Grusovin M, Papanikolaou N, Coulthard P, Worthington H . Enamel matrix derivative (Emdogain(R)) for periodontal tissue regeneration in intrabony defects. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009; (4):CD003875. PMC: 6786880. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003875.pub3. View

5.
Stefanini M, Rendon A, Zucchelli A, Sangiorgi M, Zucchelli G . Avoiding errors and complications related to immediate implant placement in the esthetic area with a mucogingival approach. Periodontol 2000. 2023; 92(1):362-372. DOI: 10.1111/prd.12491. View