» Articles » PMID: 38170479

The Effect of Long-Term (Im)balance of Giving Versus Receiving Support With Nonrelatives on Subjective Well-Being Among Home-Dwelling Older People

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Although many studies have explored the benefits of support giving or receiving for older people, little is known about how the balance between giving and receiving instrumental support in nonrelative relationships affects home-dwelling older people. This study examines the relationship between long-term support balance and subjective well-being in relationships with nonrelatives among older people across 11 European countries.

Methods: A total of 4,650 participants aged 60 years and older from 3 waves of the Survey of Health and Retirement in Europe were included. Support balance was calculated as the intensity difference between support received and support given across 3 waves. Multiple autoregressive analyses were conducted to test the relationship between support balance and subjective well-being, as indicated by quality of life, depression, and life satisfaction.

Results: The impact of balanced versus imbalanced support on all subjective well-being measurements was not significantly different. Compared to balanced support, imbalanced receiving was negatively related to subjective well-being and imbalanced giving was not related to better subjective well-being. Compared to imbalanced receiving, imbalanced giving showed to be the more beneficial for all subjective well-being measures.

Discussion: Our results highlight the beneficial role of imbalanced giving and balanced support for older people compared to imbalanced receiving. Policies and practices should prioritize creating an age-friendly environment that promotes active participation and mutual support among older people, as this may be effective to enhance their well-being.

Citing Articles

Wellbeing and Retirement in Europe: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

Teques A, Carreiro J, Duarte D, Teques P Healthcare (Basel). 2025; 13(2).

PMID: 39857127 PMC: 11765041. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare13020100.

References
1.
Lestari S, de Luna X, Eriksson M, Malmberg G, Ng N . Changes in the provision of instrumental support by older adults in nine European countries during 2004-2015: a panel data analysis. BMC Geriatr. 2020; 20(1):436. PMC: 7603660. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-020-01785-4. View

2.
Wang D, Gruenewald T . The psychological costs of social support imbalance: Variation across relationship context and age. J Health Psychol. 2017; 24(12):1615-1625. PMC: 7008943. DOI: 10.1177/1359105317692854. View

3.
Tengku Mohd T, Mohd Yunus R, Hairi F, Hairi N, Choo W . Social support and depression among community dwelling older adults in Asia: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2019; 9(7):e026667. PMC: 6661578. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026667. View

4.
Chen E, Lam P, Finegood E, Turiano N, Mroczek D, Miller G . The balance of giving versus receiving social support and all-cause mortality in a US national sample. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021; 118(24). PMC: 8214686. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2024770118. View

5.
Schafer M, Sun H, Lee J . Compensatory Connections? Living Alone, Loneliness, and the Buffering Role of Social Connection Among Older American and European Adults. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2021; 77(8):1550-1560. DOI: 10.1093/geronb/gbab217. View