» Articles » PMID: 38167575

Finite Element Analysis and Clinical Study of Chest Wall Reconstruction Using Carbon Fiber Artificial Rib

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2024 Jan 3
PMID 38167575
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Carbon fiber composites are emerging as a promising new biomaterial for chest wall reconstruction implants due to their mechanical properties and biocompatibility. This work evaluates the biomechanics of carbon fiber artificial ribs using finite element analysis and clinical implementation. Static simulations of normal breathing process show the maximum stress on the implant is only 2.83 MPa, far below the material ultimate strength of 60 MPa, indicating the excellent fit for maintaining respiratory function. Dynamic collision simulations demonstrate the artificial rib model could withstand a 4 kg rigid object impact at 2 m/s without fracture. Reconstructing the artificial rib with a human rib in the finite element analysis model increases the overall stress tolerance. The impact force required for fracture increases 48% compared to the artificial rib alone, suggesting improved strength from rib integration. Clinically, 10 of 13 patients receiving the artificial rib implants show no significant loss of pulmonary function based on spirometry tests. Based on our findings, the combined simulations and clinical results validate the strong mechanical performance and biocompatibility of the carbon fiber artificial ribs for chest wall reconstruction under static and dynamic loading while maintaining normal respiratory function.

Citing Articles

Finite element investigation for improving chest wall reconstruction process using ceramic and polymeric implants.

Shash Y Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):1502.

PMID: 39788988 PMC: 11718210. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-79536-3.


Complex chest wall reconstruction after failure: a literature review.

Brascia D, Mangiameli G, Marulli G J Thorac Dis. 2024; 16(7):4780-4793.

PMID: 39144326 PMC: 11320226. DOI: 10.21037/jtd-23-1431.

References
1.
Torcasio A, Zhang X, Van Oosterwyck H, Duyck J, van Lenthe G . Use of micro-CT-based finite element analysis to accurately quantify peri-implant bone strains: a validation in rat tibiae. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2011; 11(5):743-50. DOI: 10.1007/s10237-011-0347-6. View

2.
Li Z, Kindig M, Subit D, Kent R . Influence of mesh density, cortical thickness and material properties on human rib fracture prediction. Med Eng Phys. 2010; 32(9):998-1008. DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2010.06.015. View

3.
Anez-Bustillos L, Derikx L, Verdonschot N, Calderon N, Zurakowski D, Snyder B . Finite element analysis and CT-based structural rigidity analysis to assess failure load in bones with simulated lytic defects. Bone. 2013; 58:160-7. PMC: 3908856. DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2013.10.009. View

4.
Incarbone M, Pastorino U . Surgical treatment of chest wall tumors. World J Surg. 2001; 25(2):218-30. DOI: 10.1007/s002680020022. View

5.
Pesakova V, Klezl Z, Balik K, Adam M . Biomechanical and biological properties of the implant material carbon-carbon composite covered with pyrolytic carbon. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2004; 11(12):793-8. DOI: 10.1023/a:1008953529111. View